Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JeffB" data-source="post: 371471" data-attributes="member: 518">Re: It's good to be... ah nevermind!Good Comments for the most part in your post, but I cannot agree with the above. Dragon 300 might have had less typos, but overall I think that's like saying " This is the least smelly pile of dog-poopy I've stepped in lately"... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />I think the general concensus on this board (in the least) is that 300 was hardly a great issue, let alone a decent anniversary issue. It had it's bits and pieces taht everyone liked, but overall was no better  or worse than what Dragon has been like from about mid 2001 on.3 issues under their belt does not neccesarily make the sub worth it...espcially since it's probably those issues were done before the sale went through or very near that time period.That being said, I'm not sure Dragon could get worse, so I guess at that rate WOTC did us a service (and made a good management decision) by putting the ball in someone elses court. Your other points while I do not neccessarily agree with, were well thought out, and good food for thought <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification