Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Wraithstrike the wrong level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="two" data-source="post: 3273493" data-attributes="member: 9002"><p><strong>3.0 haste</strong></p><p></p><p>This reminds me - a lot - of the old 3.0 haste discussions that raged.</p><p></p><p>One excellent way to get to the root of it is this... (thinking about haste now):</p><p></p><p>If 3.0 haste were stripped from 3.0 entirely - never existed - and then suddenly a player came to you with 3.0 haste and asked if it was a reasonable 3rd level spell, what would your line of logic be?</p><p></p><p>3.0 haste: no action to cast (as you immediately get another partial)</p><p>3.0 haste: allows 2 spells/round or partial charge/full attack for the fighters</p><p></p><p>To try to judge an appropriate spell level, what does it take to get 2 spells off in a round. Quicken, bump up 4 levels, or ... contingency... time stop... various other high level combos.</p><p></p><p>Yet you cast 3.0 haste and can suddenly cast 2 spells a round with no penalty? (one is not at +4 spell levels or anything). </p><p></p><p>And it lasts X level rounds? Plus has other effects (partial charge + full attack was always gross for melee guys).</p><p></p><p>As a GM you would laugh, and call it a level 8 or 9 spell. Honestly, if 3.0 haste never existed, then was brought in as a level 9 spell, it would STILL be taken fairly regularly by high level casters. It compares well to time stop: time stop lets you do it in one round, while haste of course spreads out the pain over X rounds. Or, haste, THEN time stop... ha ha.</p><p></p><p>++++++++</p><p></p><p>So do the same with Wraithstrike. Act like it never existed. Have a player offer it as a 2nd level spell. As a GM, do you laugh him out of the room?</p><p></p><p>You do.</p><p></p><p>Comparing to Deep Impact (the best parallel) gives a spell level of 4-5 for a single attack; for full attacks... what... 7-8 level? As an immediate action + full attacks...that's ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>++++++++</p><p></p><p>3.0 haste was "slap me in the face" way too powerful, yet some people argued it was ok in "their campaigns." That's not what we are talking about. Overall, it was a very poor spell for the game as a whole. It was used far too much, and it was much too good for any caster not to select.</p><p></p><p>I feel the same about Wraithstrike. So trivially easy to abuse and maximize, and the insta-cast feature is absurd.</p><p></p><p>Plus, there is NO way to avoid TPK vs. dragons at this point. If the dragons are wise and smart - and they are - they will be using Wraithstrike all the time. With full power attack. I mean, really, every round they can. They will absolutely kill any PC with 2-3 hits, and they WILL hit. Why would a DRAGON not always cast this spell? What, he's waiting for the other 3-4 adventuring parties to come attack him? </p><p></p><p>Why would a PC NOT cast 3.0 haste? There were times...but overall, combats always featured haste. Why would a melee PC or monster that COULD cast Wraithstrike (or have it in an item) not use it as often as possible? No downside. They would. </p><p></p><p>Makes for a very binary game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="two, post: 3273493, member: 9002"] [b]3.0 haste[/b] This reminds me - a lot - of the old 3.0 haste discussions that raged. One excellent way to get to the root of it is this... (thinking about haste now): If 3.0 haste were stripped from 3.0 entirely - never existed - and then suddenly a player came to you with 3.0 haste and asked if it was a reasonable 3rd level spell, what would your line of logic be? 3.0 haste: no action to cast (as you immediately get another partial) 3.0 haste: allows 2 spells/round or partial charge/full attack for the fighters To try to judge an appropriate spell level, what does it take to get 2 spells off in a round. Quicken, bump up 4 levels, or ... contingency... time stop... various other high level combos. Yet you cast 3.0 haste and can suddenly cast 2 spells a round with no penalty? (one is not at +4 spell levels or anything). And it lasts X level rounds? Plus has other effects (partial charge + full attack was always gross for melee guys). As a GM you would laugh, and call it a level 8 or 9 spell. Honestly, if 3.0 haste never existed, then was brought in as a level 9 spell, it would STILL be taken fairly regularly by high level casters. It compares well to time stop: time stop lets you do it in one round, while haste of course spreads out the pain over X rounds. Or, haste, THEN time stop... ha ha. ++++++++ So do the same with Wraithstrike. Act like it never existed. Have a player offer it as a 2nd level spell. As a GM, do you laugh him out of the room? You do. Comparing to Deep Impact (the best parallel) gives a spell level of 4-5 for a single attack; for full attacks... what... 7-8 level? As an immediate action + full attacks...that's ridiculous. ++++++++ 3.0 haste was "slap me in the face" way too powerful, yet some people argued it was ok in "their campaigns." That's not what we are talking about. Overall, it was a very poor spell for the game as a whole. It was used far too much, and it was much too good for any caster not to select. I feel the same about Wraithstrike. So trivially easy to abuse and maximize, and the insta-cast feature is absurd. Plus, there is NO way to avoid TPK vs. dragons at this point. If the dragons are wise and smart - and they are - they will be using Wraithstrike all the time. With full power attack. I mean, really, every round they can. They will absolutely kill any PC with 2-3 hits, and they WILL hit. Why would a DRAGON not always cast this spell? What, he's waiting for the other 3-4 adventuring parties to come attack him? Why would a PC NOT cast 3.0 haste? There were times...but overall, combats always featured haste. Why would a melee PC or monster that COULD cast Wraithstrike (or have it in an item) not use it as often as possible? No downside. They would. Makes for a very binary game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Wraithstrike the wrong level?
Top