Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Wraithstrike the wrong level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3280005" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I think using Alter Self or Polymorph is fine. However, I do not think using them in a manner which is barred by the current rules, or which goes against the vast majority of DMs opinions as represented in the many heated debates on this board, is not a good way to analyze this spell.</p><p></p><p>For example, the current rules make your magic items meld into your body for these spells. That should be how it is evaluated.</p><p></p><p>In addition, threads on alter self are very heated in respect to what you can change into, and whether players should be allowed to flip through all the monster source books and make a list from that to change into, or whether their character has to have encountered the creature before or whether the creature has to be a common one. I think it's fair to default the way most DMs seem to allow it, which means no obscure twinked out monster that just happens to have the highest natural armor in the book (like Tren, from Savage Species and a web update, which have a +8) or Asabi for burrowing and high base speed (Movement: 50’ Ground; 20’ Burrow, from Monsters of Faerun). Just your run of the mill normal MMI creatures that characters typically encounter by the level they are casting at.</p><p></p><p>I think core + complete books is fine. I think spell compendium and campaign books and some of the more obscure specialty books isn't. Particularly with spell compendium, that stuff is taken on a case by case basis by most DMs, and shouldn't be part of a discussion of what is typical and common. </p><p></p><p>The gist of my point is we should aim for your typical character and game, and not your specialty character or game. If the point you guys are trying to make is that wraithstrike is EASY to abuse (and that does seem to be the point), then you should be using sources, and interpretations of rules, that are typical and common.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3280005, member: 2525"] I think using Alter Self or Polymorph is fine. However, I do not think using them in a manner which is barred by the current rules, or which goes against the vast majority of DMs opinions as represented in the many heated debates on this board, is not a good way to analyze this spell. For example, the current rules make your magic items meld into your body for these spells. That should be how it is evaluated. In addition, threads on alter self are very heated in respect to what you can change into, and whether players should be allowed to flip through all the monster source books and make a list from that to change into, or whether their character has to have encountered the creature before or whether the creature has to be a common one. I think it's fair to default the way most DMs seem to allow it, which means no obscure twinked out monster that just happens to have the highest natural armor in the book (like Tren, from Savage Species and a web update, which have a +8) or Asabi for burrowing and high base speed (Movement: 50’ Ground; 20’ Burrow, from Monsters of Faerun). Just your run of the mill normal MMI creatures that characters typically encounter by the level they are casting at. I think core + complete books is fine. I think spell compendium and campaign books and some of the more obscure specialty books isn't. Particularly with spell compendium, that stuff is taken on a case by case basis by most DMs, and shouldn't be part of a discussion of what is typical and common. The gist of my point is we should aim for your typical character and game, and not your specialty character or game. If the point you guys are trying to make is that wraithstrike is EASY to abuse (and that does seem to be the point), then you should be using sources, and interpretations of rules, that are typical and common. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Is Wraithstrike the wrong level?
Top