Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Issues with Summon Monster/Summon Nature's Ally (2004 Thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CPXB" data-source="post: 1470632" data-attributes="member: 17233"><p>One of the fellas a while ago posted a thread wherein people talked about the monk class . . . and I think that the monk class is more than just somewhat disingenuous. I think its broken. Many, clearly, disagree, but . . . .</p><p></p><p>Lots of people have said that monks aren't first rate melee fighters. I say, "But a huge portion of their class features at lower levels, not to mention the escalating damage of their unarmed attacks, does lead a person to think that monks should be heavy melee fighters." Furthermore, out of melee, they are almost entirely useless. Oh, they have Hide and Move Silently -- well, the rogue has that, does more damage in a fight, and is useful in other ways outside of a fight (what with the opening of locks and disarming of traps). Indeed, a monk is generally defeated by the first locked door they come across in terms of stealth. Also, compare to ranger -- best BAB, two good saves, spells, also sneaky as hell, favored enemies, animal companions, tracking, etc. Who would you want in a party? A ranger -- better melee figher (or much better ranged fighter) and excellent stealth and wilderness survival skills -- or a monk who isn't as good in melee and has no outdoors skills.</p><p></p><p>But I think the real kicker is when comparing the monk to the paladin. Paladins fight very well, have as good of saving throws with divine grace, they can cure damage and disease and they can cast some spells too boot. Oh, and they get the wonder horse. So, better in a fight and far more useful out of a fight.</p><p></p><p>I think it is reasonable to at the bare minimum suggest that the monk class has something wrong with it. Of course, YMMV. Indeed, you do seem to be getting different mileage. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>What we are going to do is go slow. What we seem to be doing right now is going through the monk class to eliminate things that I either don't care about or seem to be non-abilities (such as the ability to be immune to normal diseases . . . how often does that come up, really?) and replace them with better stuff. I'm still lobbying for feats. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CPXB, post: 1470632, member: 17233"] One of the fellas a while ago posted a thread wherein people talked about the monk class . . . and I think that the monk class is more than just somewhat disingenuous. I think its broken. Many, clearly, disagree, but . . . . Lots of people have said that monks aren't first rate melee fighters. I say, "But a huge portion of their class features at lower levels, not to mention the escalating damage of their unarmed attacks, does lead a person to think that monks should be heavy melee fighters." Furthermore, out of melee, they are almost entirely useless. Oh, they have Hide and Move Silently -- well, the rogue has that, does more damage in a fight, and is useful in other ways outside of a fight (what with the opening of locks and disarming of traps). Indeed, a monk is generally defeated by the first locked door they come across in terms of stealth. Also, compare to ranger -- best BAB, two good saves, spells, also sneaky as hell, favored enemies, animal companions, tracking, etc. Who would you want in a party? A ranger -- better melee figher (or much better ranged fighter) and excellent stealth and wilderness survival skills -- or a monk who isn't as good in melee and has no outdoors skills. But I think the real kicker is when comparing the monk to the paladin. Paladins fight very well, have as good of saving throws with divine grace, they can cure damage and disease and they can cast some spells too boot. Oh, and they get the wonder horse. So, better in a fight and far more useful out of a fight. I think it is reasonable to at the bare minimum suggest that the monk class has something wrong with it. Of course, YMMV. Indeed, you do seem to be getting different mileage. :) What we are going to do is go slow. What we seem to be doing right now is going through the monk class to eliminate things that I either don't care about or seem to be non-abilities (such as the ability to be immune to normal diseases . . . how often does that come up, really?) and replace them with better stuff. I'm still lobbying for feats. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Issues with Summon Monster/Summon Nature's Ally (2004 Thread)
Top