Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
It’s LAUNCH DAY For The Pathfinder 2 Playtest!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 7755662" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>When Paizo created Pathfinder, it was not intended to compete "head-to-head" with 4e D&D. It was intended as a stopgap measure for their survival as a company. If people have now left Pathfinder 1 due to 5e - for whatever their myriad of reasons - then Pathfinder 2 is likely also meant partially as a stopgap for their survival and as a means to evolve their game into a new future. I see them looking to retain the core of the customers they have rather than those they lost. 5e is good, but it is not perfect. I know of a number of groups here in Austria who actively prefer Pathfinder over 5e. They enjoy creating builds, more player decision points, rules mastery, the zero to EPIC! feel,etc. that 5e does not satisfactorily "solve" for them. I don't know if Pathfinder 2 will retain that core audience, but I don't think that it is fair to attribute any hubris to Paizo for creating Pathfinder 2 as WotC made 5e. </p><p></p><p>5e captured lightning in a bottle, much as WoW did with the MMORPG market. But that does not mean that every successful MMO should be WoW-like just to make a niche for itself. In fact, many games that sought to take WoW on "head-to-head" or referred to as "WoW-killers" often turned out to be duds. The MMO games that persist are often those that sought to establish their own identity. And I think that Paizo likely desires to establish their own brand identity away from D&D such that Pathfinder is not just a "D&D 3.75" brand that perpetually competes with D&D 4E, D&D 5E, or D&D 6E. But obviously their own legacy is intricately tied to D&D, so there is a difficult tight rope they are walking between their desire to preserve the spirit of Pathfinder's D&D roots while also striking into new territory. If it results in Paizo's equivalent of 4e? I'm perfectly okay with that, especially if it generates new revolutionary ideas in the market and possibly leads to Paizo's own equivalent of 5e. But I doubt that Paizo is blinded by hubris. I think that they have genuine love for Pathfinder and the d20 system. </p><p></p><p>I have my own issues with Pathfinder 2. I don't know if I will play it. My gaming group has enough games as it is that we are looking to play. But I also don't know if I will play 5e for reasons other than convenience of what my group may want. There are a lot of us in my gaming group who are dissatisfied with 5e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 7755662, member: 5142"] When Paizo created Pathfinder, it was not intended to compete "head-to-head" with 4e D&D. It was intended as a stopgap measure for their survival as a company. If people have now left Pathfinder 1 due to 5e - for whatever their myriad of reasons - then Pathfinder 2 is likely also meant partially as a stopgap for their survival and as a means to evolve their game into a new future. I see them looking to retain the core of the customers they have rather than those they lost. 5e is good, but it is not perfect. I know of a number of groups here in Austria who actively prefer Pathfinder over 5e. They enjoy creating builds, more player decision points, rules mastery, the zero to EPIC! feel,etc. that 5e does not satisfactorily "solve" for them. I don't know if Pathfinder 2 will retain that core audience, but I don't think that it is fair to attribute any hubris to Paizo for creating Pathfinder 2 as WotC made 5e. 5e captured lightning in a bottle, much as WoW did with the MMORPG market. But that does not mean that every successful MMO should be WoW-like just to make a niche for itself. In fact, many games that sought to take WoW on "head-to-head" or referred to as "WoW-killers" often turned out to be duds. The MMO games that persist are often those that sought to establish their own identity. And I think that Paizo likely desires to establish their own brand identity away from D&D such that Pathfinder is not just a "D&D 3.75" brand that perpetually competes with D&D 4E, D&D 5E, or D&D 6E. But obviously their own legacy is intricately tied to D&D, so there is a difficult tight rope they are walking between their desire to preserve the spirit of Pathfinder's D&D roots while also striking into new territory. If it results in Paizo's equivalent of 4e? I'm perfectly okay with that, especially if it generates new revolutionary ideas in the market and possibly leads to Paizo's own equivalent of 5e. But I doubt that Paizo is blinded by hubris. I think that they have genuine love for Pathfinder and the d20 system. I have my own issues with Pathfinder 2. I don't know if I will play it. My gaming group has enough games as it is that we are looking to play. But I also don't know if I will play 5e for reasons other than convenience of what my group may want. There are a lot of us in my gaming group who are dissatisfied with 5e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
It’s LAUNCH DAY For The Pathfinder 2 Playtest!
Top