Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Teataine" data-source="post: 6245302" data-attributes="member: 6678036">Of course, I'd like to see more stuff like that posted here. I apologize if I was overly dismissive, I'm just used to people being critical of the playtest rules without actually addressing the fact this is a playtest and the designers should be informed of any bugs we find.As for the build itself, I did read the thread and I was addressing the specifically ridiculously high AC that's achieved by piling up all the possible bonuses. That number is indeed farily silly but it's extremely circumstantial and improbable, like I said.As for the 27 AC+disadvantage mountain dwarf ranger/mage, it could be problematic, but not necessarily. 27 seems to be pretty much the limit to what you can get within the bounded accuracy paradigm anyway, so while this character does get it extremely early (lvl 7), it's not exactly out of the ballpark. It's possible to achieve the same AC with different class/item combinations, so I'm assuming the devs are aware of this, and it's not a freak anomaly, but merely a very high (or highest possible) AC. I'm also assuming the monsters in the latest Bestiary are missing a Proficiency/level-based bonus to attacks which was introduced to PCs only in the latest packets. So, unbalanced? Probably, given the level at which it can be achieved. But I wouldn't call it game breaking quite yet.</blockquote>