Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 8741811" data-attributes="member: 59816">It's probably a stretch to say &quot;everything good&quot; was shouted down, but there were definitely some things that would have likely been better (the sorcerer comes to mind).You are absolutely right that often people can be victims of &quot;be careful what you wish for&quot;. For example, if it were entirely up to me, I'd make big sweeping changes (I'd make 6e for sure) to fix everything that I think could be better. Would it be a better game? IDK, but I am SURE that I would create the very problem I've been discussing here: I'd throw some babies out with the bathwater and create unforeseen new problems that would need to be fixed 5 years in. In other words, I'd be wrong to do so. Tweaking a few issues that many people agree (is it most people? IDK) are not great but leaving the bulk of 5e alone seems like a smarter bet to me. And it looks like the designers have that planned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 8741811, member: 59816"] It's probably a stretch to say "everything good" was shouted down, but there were definitely some things that would have likely been better (the sorcerer comes to mind). You are absolutely right that often people can be victims of "be careful what you wish for". For example, if it were entirely up to me, I'd make big sweeping changes (I'd make 6e for sure) to fix everything that I think could be better. Would it be a better game? IDK, but I am SURE that I would create the very problem I've been discussing here: I'd throw some babies out with the bathwater and create unforeseen new problems that would need to be fixed 5 years in. In other words, I'd be wrong to do so. Tweaking a few issues that many people agree (is it most people? IDK) are not great but leaving the bulk of 5e alone seems like a smarter bet to me. And it looks like the designers have that planned. [/QUOTE]

Verification