Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 6002102" data-attributes="member: 5038">Yes. I did.&nbsp; I talked about both backgrounds and specialties before.I only mentioned&nbsp; Weapon, Armor and +1 attack bonus.I never said a fey battle sorcerer would have breath weapon or elemental resistance. Those are abilities that would be tied to heritage given the current set upAgain, in the post you quoted, I am talking about moving only the Armor, Weapon and +1 weapon attack bonus out of the Draconic Heritage.Right now,&nbsp; the Draconic Sorcerer is martial and you can't get around since armor, weapons and armor and the +1 weapon attack bonus are built into the heritage. Not everyone wants a draconic &quot;gish&quot; or any sorcerous gish. Others might.&nbsp;&nbsp; The game should support both and moving the armor, weapon and +1 weapon to a Specialty requiring a sorcerer heritage does this.&nbsp;&nbsp; The character could have his d8 hit die (maybe, dragon ancestry makes he character tougher). And would still keep sorcerous powers and spells (which, hopefully, will undergo some enlargement as the selection is pathetic, in my opinion)The last thing is exactly what some people want, an innate caster with a dragon as an ancestor and that is it.&nbsp; &nbsp; Not everyone wants claws, scales and breath weapon- for many people it is simply over the top. (just as for many people like Umbran find the vanilla sorcerer boring).&nbsp; Or, maybe, they want a dragon heritage to grant resistance and minor abilities like dragon vision abilities. Personally, I prefer 3e heritage feats to the current set up or Pathfinder's bloodlines, but I'll wait to see what a vanilla sorcerer looks like.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greg K, post: 6002102, member: 5038"] Yes. I did. I talked about both backgrounds and specialties before. I only mentioned Weapon, Armor and +1 attack bonus. I never said a fey battle sorcerer would have breath weapon or elemental resistance. Those are abilities that would be tied to heritage given the current set up Again, in the post you quoted, I am talking about moving only the Armor, Weapon and +1 weapon attack bonus out of the Draconic Heritage. Right now, the Draconic Sorcerer is martial and you can't get around since armor, weapons and armor and the +1 weapon attack bonus are built into the heritage. Not everyone wants a draconic "gish" or any sorcerous gish. Others might. The game should support both and moving the armor, weapon and +1 weapon to a Specialty requiring a sorcerer heritage does this. The character could have his d8 hit die (maybe, dragon ancestry makes he character tougher). And would still keep sorcerous powers and spells (which, hopefully, will undergo some enlargement as the selection is pathetic, in my opinion) The last thing is exactly what some people want, an innate caster with a dragon as an ancestor and that is it. Not everyone wants claws, scales and breath weapon- for many people it is simply over the top. (just as for many people like Umbran find the vanilla sorcerer boring). Or, maybe, they want a dragon heritage to grant resistance and minor abilities like dragon vision abilities. Personally, I prefer 3e heritage feats to the current set up or Pathfinder's bloodlines, but I'll wait to see what a vanilla sorcerer looks like. [/QUOTE]

Verification