Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NotAYakk" data-source="post: 7987881" data-attributes="member: 72555">Basically, it is exhaustion in exchange for about half a feat of benefit.And if the argument stopped there you'd have a point.But it doesn't.  It goes on to describe the size of the gap, and checks if there are mitigsting circumstances.For example, imagine two classes, otherwise identical, but class B has half the HP and half the Damage per action.  Otherwisr completely identical.While one class is weaker, that is not all.  B is dominated by A.  And the gap is large.Now suppose B has half the damage, but twice the HP. Now saying which is worse is harder; quite possibly there would be solid arguments for either.Or B has the same HP but 5% less damage.  Now it is dominated, but the gap is small.Champion's problem compated to BM is that near brainless near zero tactics BM play dominates the Champion.  And the gap is pretty significant."X is the worst" is where you start.  The argument continues from there. If you stop reading at that, sure the srgument sucks, but really it is a problem with your reading, not the argument.</blockquote>