Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
It is OK for a class to be the worst
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 7989060" data-attributes="member: 7019027"><p>Not always, I was clearly mistaken. I don't mean to discredit your experiences either. </p><p></p><p>That said, that doesn't mean it'd a bad class. Every class's effectiveness depends on the DM, setting, campaign, and players. Only one of those are something you can control. </p><p></p><p>If you find a class unfit for your table's playstyle, that's fine. But I <em>am</em> sick of people putting barriers to playing a class by calling then incompetent or busted or unfun to people that otherwise would've given it a shot. </p><p></p><p>I've had it happen just this recent campaign I'm DM'ing, someone saying that BM Ranger is useless and nobody should build one. And nothing gets me more upset than someone telling someone else that they can't play what they want to play after I've already given the go-ahead. </p><p></p><p>It's why, if you've noticed, I work hard finding off-the-cuff scenarios where an unpopular feature can be useful. Because people might get the wrong idea going through these threads with a unanimous "this sucks and needs a homebrew." </p><p></p><p>So yeah, if it seems like I put alot of effort defending these stuff, I do. I balance encounters like the book says because I want martials to shine with their unlimited stuff. I run hexcrawls because they allow the Ranger to shine where fast travel skips the important parts. I prepare my NPC's so the bard actually reads something useful when they read minds. </p><p></p><p>As a DM, I feel it's my job to create an impartial playing ground without catering or pandering. You choose a class, you're getting it as written and you're going to run my pre-built adventure as one of the protagonist just like the warlock and bard and druid. </p><p></p><p>I'm running the game as-written, no adjustments or arrangements, and every subclass, background feature, racial trait, and ability score gets their equal attention through monsters from the MM (possibly re-skinned), Traps (using the DMG process), Dungeons (built with DMG tables), and the planes (from the DMG.) All options from Xanathar's and PHB is allowed. All my magic items are ripped from the DMG. Downtime and lifestyle expenses are used. Carrying capacity is used. Ammunition is used. </p><p></p><p>And I'm convinced that a game that does the same will find all classes, subclasses, and features well-balanced. It's fun, but it requires preparation and the willingness to understand all of the rules. But I do it because I want my players to have fun regardless of their playstyle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 7989060, member: 7019027"] Not always, I was clearly mistaken. I don't mean to discredit your experiences either. That said, that doesn't mean it'd a bad class. Every class's effectiveness depends on the DM, setting, campaign, and players. Only one of those are something you can control. If you find a class unfit for your table's playstyle, that's fine. But I [I]am[/I] sick of people putting barriers to playing a class by calling then incompetent or busted or unfun to people that otherwise would've given it a shot. I've had it happen just this recent campaign I'm DM'ing, someone saying that BM Ranger is useless and nobody should build one. And nothing gets me more upset than someone telling someone else that they can't play what they want to play after I've already given the go-ahead. It's why, if you've noticed, I work hard finding off-the-cuff scenarios where an unpopular feature can be useful. Because people might get the wrong idea going through these threads with a unanimous "this sucks and needs a homebrew." So yeah, if it seems like I put alot of effort defending these stuff, I do. I balance encounters like the book says because I want martials to shine with their unlimited stuff. I run hexcrawls because they allow the Ranger to shine where fast travel skips the important parts. I prepare my NPC's so the bard actually reads something useful when they read minds. As a DM, I feel it's my job to create an impartial playing ground without catering or pandering. You choose a class, you're getting it as written and you're going to run my pre-built adventure as one of the protagonist just like the warlock and bard and druid. I'm running the game as-written, no adjustments or arrangements, and every subclass, background feature, racial trait, and ability score gets their equal attention through monsters from the MM (possibly re-skinned), Traps (using the DMG process), Dungeons (built with DMG tables), and the planes (from the DMG.) All options from Xanathar's and PHB is allowed. All my magic items are ripped from the DMG. Downtime and lifestyle expenses are used. Carrying capacity is used. Ammunition is used. And I'm convinced that a game that does the same will find all classes, subclasses, and features well-balanced. It's fun, but it requires preparation and the willingness to understand all of the rules. But I do it because I want my players to have fun regardless of their playstyle. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
It is OK for a class to be the worst
Top