Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aristotle" data-source="post: 1216034" data-attributes="member: 5885">Which is basically what I said. He doesn't think it should have been left in the game, and isn't sure why it is still there... but he doesn't say that the current wording is cloudy... he gives an example showing that the &quot;caster levels as pre-requisite&quot; thing is valid by the current wording in the book.I'm not saying that caster levels should be pre-reqs or that the designers want it to be that way. I'm just saying that the current wording, by admission of one of the original developers, calls for it. I fully expect to see it changed in an errata (and big discussions like this one are the sort of thing to bring about such eratta). But, as others have said, this is a rules forum and the most current printing of the rules state caster levels are a pre-req. If you felt the wording was cloudy... Monte was nice enough to clear it up and tell us what the intent of the wording is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aristotle, post: 1216034, member: 5885"] Which is basically what I said. He doesn't think it should have been left in the game, and isn't sure why it is still there... but he doesn't say that the current wording is cloudy... he gives an example showing that the "caster levels as pre-requisite" thing is valid by the current wording in the book. I'm not saying that caster levels should be pre-reqs or that the designers want it to be that way. I'm just saying that the current wording, by admission of one of the original developers, calls for it. I fully expect to see it changed in an errata (and big discussions like this one are the sort of thing to bring about such eratta). But, as others have said, this is a rules forum and the most current printing of the rules state caster levels are a pre-req. If you felt the wording was cloudy... Monte was nice enough to clear it up and tell us what the intent of the wording is. [/QUOTE]

Verification