Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Item Requires ___ to Use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzarevitch" data-source="post: 1283607" data-attributes="member: 1792"><p>I disagree. You are implying that only NPCs can ever get a cost reduction and that makes no sense. I don't have my DMG in front of me but I don't recall anything that says that that magic item creation table is for DMs only. The tables are there in the book therefore using them is not a house rule. The key is not to permit a reduction unless the restriction is actually real and significant. There is nothing that says it has to be a restriction for the maker or the primary user. </p><p></p><p>Restricted use items DO have a downside and we have seen it come up often in the campaigns that I play in and ones that I run. The downside is that there is a smaller population of people who can use the item. This impacts resale value and operational use.</p><p></p><p>Resale value is impacted in event that you want to get a new item or simply want to be rid of the old item. Depending on the restriction it may be nearly impossible to sell the old item. The key is for the DM to not slavishly follow the prices listed in the book. </p><p></p><p>If a PC makes an ubersword mark 1 worth 200,000gp (before discount) with a restricted use that prevents it from being used by anyone except a follower of a certain deity who also has 13+ Ranks in Knowledge(Religion), who is also a member of the Brotherhood of Eight, he is going to have a hard time getting much for it when he finds an ubersword mark 2 and wants to free up the cash invested in the first one. As DM I would give the full 30% price reduction for that restriction because he is trading away the ability to get a credible resale value on it later in return for a reduced GP, XP and construction time cost now.</p><p></p><p>Note no merchant in his right mind is going to purchase that sword despite the fact its technical value is 140,000gp because the use restriction is so severe that no one will buy it from <em>him</em> if he is stupid enough to buy it from the PC in the first place. In other words, its actual value for anyone who is not a member of the limited class of people who can use it is the value of a masterwork sword (because that is all it really is to them). </p><p></p><p>The second painful downside to putting a use restriction is that your own party members probably can't use it if you go down. If the wizard put use restrictions on his Staff of Ultimate power and then gets knocked out of the battle, it it possible that no one else can use his staff when the party really needs its Ultimate Power. </p><p></p><p>Tzarevitch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzarevitch, post: 1283607, member: 1792"] I disagree. You are implying that only NPCs can ever get a cost reduction and that makes no sense. I don't have my DMG in front of me but I don't recall anything that says that that magic item creation table is for DMs only. The tables are there in the book therefore using them is not a house rule. The key is not to permit a reduction unless the restriction is actually real and significant. There is nothing that says it has to be a restriction for the maker or the primary user. Restricted use items DO have a downside and we have seen it come up often in the campaigns that I play in and ones that I run. The downside is that there is a smaller population of people who can use the item. This impacts resale value and operational use. Resale value is impacted in event that you want to get a new item or simply want to be rid of the old item. Depending on the restriction it may be nearly impossible to sell the old item. The key is for the DM to not slavishly follow the prices listed in the book. If a PC makes an ubersword mark 1 worth 200,000gp (before discount) with a restricted use that prevents it from being used by anyone except a follower of a certain deity who also has 13+ Ranks in Knowledge(Religion), who is also a member of the Brotherhood of Eight, he is going to have a hard time getting much for it when he finds an ubersword mark 2 and wants to free up the cash invested in the first one. As DM I would give the full 30% price reduction for that restriction because he is trading away the ability to get a credible resale value on it later in return for a reduced GP, XP and construction time cost now. Note no merchant in his right mind is going to purchase that sword despite the fact its technical value is 140,000gp because the use restriction is so severe that no one will buy it from [I]him[/I] if he is stupid enough to buy it from the PC in the first place. In other words, its actual value for anyone who is not a member of the limited class of people who can use it is the value of a masterwork sword (because that is all it really is to them). The second painful downside to putting a use restriction is that your own party members probably can't use it if you go down. If the wizard put use restrictions on his Staff of Ultimate power and then gets knocked out of the battle, it it possible that no one else can use his staff when the party really needs its Ultimate Power. Tzarevitch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Item Requires ___ to Use
Top