Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Items with always active properties held in off-hand with shield
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DreamChaser" data-source="post: 5025658" data-attributes="member: 1190"><p>These ideas contradict each other (as is often the case with FAQ items). Implements are "weapons" for casters. If AV is correct, then the FAQ is not. If the FAQ is correct then AV is not.</p><p></p><p>It raises the question of why a magical dagger held along with the light shield with a sword and board fighter (or warlord) would not grant it's property but the wand held by a bard would. Or the dagger held by the bard who took Arcane Implement Proficiency to gain dagger as an implement.</p><p></p><p>Or what about the fact that many weapons simply are implements...staffs for example. Technically, a light or heavy blade is always an implement for swordmages everywhere. Why can't my fighter gain the benefit of the short sword he holds with his shield...it is an implement for his swordmage buddy?</p><p></p><p>IMO, treating Implements and Weapons as different from each other when it comes to properties working is a scary and arbitrary ruling that penalizes the martial power source and defenders over the other roles / sources.</p><p></p><p>IMO, the only difference between implements and weapons is the type of power they are used with.</p><p></p><p>My ruling that is (I believe) in line with the RAI:</p><p></p><p>Weapon / Implement = grants bonus to attack and damage when used with a power that has the correct keyword. If a power has the Weapon keyword, you gain the weapon's proficiency bonus. If the power has the implement keyword, you don't. If it has neither keyword, you cannot use a weapon / implement to use the power. In order to gain any benefits from a weapon, implement (attack bonus, damage bonus, property, powers), you must be properly wielding the item. </p><p></p><p>Thus, a swordmage cannot use swordmage implement powers with a glaive held in one hand; a bard cannot use an implement power with a wand held in the hand he uses to hold his shield. A ranger cannot attack with a ranged power using the bow strapped to his back. In all of these cases, the character's don't gain the benefit of any properties, either.</p><p></p><p>There are no other differences between these types of items.</p><p></p><p>DC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DreamChaser, post: 5025658, member: 1190"] These ideas contradict each other (as is often the case with FAQ items). Implements are "weapons" for casters. If AV is correct, then the FAQ is not. If the FAQ is correct then AV is not. It raises the question of why a magical dagger held along with the light shield with a sword and board fighter (or warlord) would not grant it's property but the wand held by a bard would. Or the dagger held by the bard who took Arcane Implement Proficiency to gain dagger as an implement. Or what about the fact that many weapons simply are implements...staffs for example. Technically, a light or heavy blade is always an implement for swordmages everywhere. Why can't my fighter gain the benefit of the short sword he holds with his shield...it is an implement for his swordmage buddy? IMO, treating Implements and Weapons as different from each other when it comes to properties working is a scary and arbitrary ruling that penalizes the martial power source and defenders over the other roles / sources. IMO, the only difference between implements and weapons is the type of power they are used with. My ruling that is (I believe) in line with the RAI: Weapon / Implement = grants bonus to attack and damage when used with a power that has the correct keyword. If a power has the Weapon keyword, you gain the weapon's proficiency bonus. If the power has the implement keyword, you don't. If it has neither keyword, you cannot use a weapon / implement to use the power. In order to gain any benefits from a weapon, implement (attack bonus, damage bonus, property, powers), you must be properly wielding the item. Thus, a swordmage cannot use swordmage implement powers with a glaive held in one hand; a bard cannot use an implement power with a wand held in the hand he uses to hold his shield. A ranger cannot attack with a ranged power using the bow strapped to his back. In all of these cases, the character's don't gain the benefit of any properties, either. There are no other differences between these types of items. DC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Items with always active properties held in off-hand with shield
Top