Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Iterative attacks and Precision damage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyVulpine" data-source="post: 4980825" data-attributes="member: 84790"><p>I know that sneak attacks count as precision damage.</p><p></p><p>For sneak attacks, a rogue can deal sneak attacks for all their attack rolls, as long as their enemy's denied dex bonus to AC, or flanked.</p><p></p><p>If they're invisible, only their first attack in the series counts for sneak attack damage. If greater invisibility is used, sneak attacks can be used for all attacks while the spell is in effect.</p><p></p><p>As with all precision damage, sneak attacks are never multiplied in critical hits.</p><p></p><p>All those, I'm comfortable with, it's clearly laid out in the rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p>For Manyshot, it clearly states in the feat description that one attack roll is used, and all precision damage (including crit hit) is only applied to the first arrow in the volley.</p><p></p><p>In the <a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/feats.htm" target="_blank">D20srd</a> entry for the epic feat "Improved Manyshot" we can see that it states:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>From that we can see that even the ranger's favored enemy bonus is considered precision damage, and is only applied once.</p><p></p><p>In the official D&D 3.5 FAQ, the sage states:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is correct?</p><p></p><p></p><p>----------------</p><p></p><p>Point Blank Shot looks to be precision damage. It seems if it were to be applied to Manyshot, only the first arrow has the +1 damage bonus.</p><p></p><p>What if we were to bring in iterative attacks?</p><p></p><p>Say we have a lev 6 ranger (BAB of +6/+1), with 18 dex, 14 str. He's carrying a +2 enhancement mighty (+3 str) composite bow of frost. He's using point blank shot to shoot at an enemy. What would his attack and damage rolls be?</p><p></p><p>Would it be +12/+8 (adding PBS to both rolls?) or +12/+7 (adding PBS to first roll only). Would his damage modifiers be 1d8 + 1d6 + 7 for both rolls, or +7 for the first roll, and +6 for the second?</p><p></p><p>---------------</p><p></p><p>Say the ranger above got improved rapid shot (like rapid shot but without the -2 penalty to all attacks). For simplicity sake, he's the same level.</p><p></p><p>His attack rolls would be +12/+12/+7.</p><p></p><p>Throw in a wizard's haste, as well as PBS. Which would apply first? Would you put in PBS then haste to get +13/+13/+12/+7? or haste then PBS (if we were to guess that PBS only applied to one attack) to get +13/+12/+12/+7?</p><p></p><p>--------------</p><p></p><p>Pertaining to the two above examples, in Complete Arcane (page 86), under the heading "Multiple Hits", it seems to support that Point Blank Shot counts as precision damage, and is only applied to the first damage in an iterative attack.</p><p></p><p>The example they used was a lev 7 sorcerer/lev 3 rogue, casting scorching ray (2 rays). If the first ray hit, it would do 6d6 damage (4d6 normal + 2d6 sneak attack + 1 for PBS), and just 4d6 for subsequent rays. Are there any other places in the core books where this is backed up, and the rule is clearly stated?</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>-GV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyVulpine, post: 4980825, member: 84790"] I know that sneak attacks count as precision damage. For sneak attacks, a rogue can deal sneak attacks for all their attack rolls, as long as their enemy's denied dex bonus to AC, or flanked. If they're invisible, only their first attack in the series counts for sneak attack damage. If greater invisibility is used, sneak attacks can be used for all attacks while the spell is in effect. As with all precision damage, sneak attacks are never multiplied in critical hits. All those, I'm comfortable with, it's clearly laid out in the rules. For Manyshot, it clearly states in the feat description that one attack roll is used, and all precision damage (including crit hit) is only applied to the first arrow in the volley. In the [URL="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/feats.htm"]D20srd[/URL] entry for the epic feat "Improved Manyshot" we can see that it states: From that we can see that even the ranger's favored enemy bonus is considered precision damage, and is only applied once. In the official D&D 3.5 FAQ, the sage states: Which is correct? ---------------- Point Blank Shot looks to be precision damage. It seems if it were to be applied to Manyshot, only the first arrow has the +1 damage bonus. What if we were to bring in iterative attacks? Say we have a lev 6 ranger (BAB of +6/+1), with 18 dex, 14 str. He's carrying a +2 enhancement mighty (+3 str) composite bow of frost. He's using point blank shot to shoot at an enemy. What would his attack and damage rolls be? Would it be +12/+8 (adding PBS to both rolls?) or +12/+7 (adding PBS to first roll only). Would his damage modifiers be 1d8 + 1d6 + 7 for both rolls, or +7 for the first roll, and +6 for the second? --------------- Say the ranger above got improved rapid shot (like rapid shot but without the -2 penalty to all attacks). For simplicity sake, he's the same level. His attack rolls would be +12/+12/+7. Throw in a wizard's haste, as well as PBS. Which would apply first? Would you put in PBS then haste to get +13/+13/+12/+7? or haste then PBS (if we were to guess that PBS only applied to one attack) to get +13/+12/+12/+7? -------------- Pertaining to the two above examples, in Complete Arcane (page 86), under the heading "Multiple Hits", it seems to support that Point Blank Shot counts as precision damage, and is only applied to the first damage in an iterative attack. The example they used was a lev 7 sorcerer/lev 3 rogue, casting scorching ray (2 rays). If the first ray hit, it would do 6d6 damage (4d6 normal + 2d6 sneak attack + 1 for PBS), and just 4d6 for subsequent rays. Are there any other places in the core books where this is backed up, and the rule is clearly stated? Thanks, -GV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Iterative attacks and Precision damage
Top