Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Iterative Attacks for Monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 3685859" data-attributes="member: 16285"><p>True, as was I.</p><p></p><p>It is <em>technically</em> a type of standard action. Which was my point.</p><p></p><p>An attack is a <em>type</em> of standard action, like movement is a type of move action.</p><p></p><p>In order to get more attacks in a round (based on a high BAB, two weapons or other method) you must use the full attack action (a type of full round action). But we know that already and that is why you don't get multiple standard actions a round (based on a high BAB) but only "attacks".</p><p></p><p>The question I was addressing was about using multiple supernatural actions (as if they were attacks) and referring to them as "attack actions", which mucks up the difference.</p><p></p><p>A supernatural ability (unless stated specifically otherwise) is not an attack action but a standard action.</p><p></p><p>If we continue to call things attack actions (as if that was something other than a subset of a standard action) then it will continually lead to the confusion (and logic being used) by the post I was answering.</p><p></p><p>If we recognize that when attack action is used it is not a separate type of action but rather a type of standard action then things become clearer and the rules make more sense. Reinforcing the confusion by not pointing out that there are certain categories of actions (e.g., move, standard, full round, free, non-action, swift and immediate) and certain kinds of sub types of those actions (attack, movement, full attack, charge, etc.) will only aid in the people understand what the rules are actually saying.</p><p></p><p>So I appologize for not really making it clear what I was talking about earlier.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 3685859, member: 16285"] True, as was I. It is [I]technically[/I] a type of standard action. Which was my point. An attack is a [I]type[/I] of standard action, like movement is a type of move action. In order to get more attacks in a round (based on a high BAB, two weapons or other method) you must use the full attack action (a type of full round action). But we know that already and that is why you don't get multiple standard actions a round (based on a high BAB) but only "attacks". The question I was addressing was about using multiple supernatural actions (as if they were attacks) and referring to them as "attack actions", which mucks up the difference. A supernatural ability (unless stated specifically otherwise) is not an attack action but a standard action. If we continue to call things attack actions (as if that was something other than a subset of a standard action) then it will continually lead to the confusion (and logic being used) by the post I was answering. If we recognize that when attack action is used it is not a separate type of action but rather a type of standard action then things become clearer and the rules make more sense. Reinforcing the confusion by not pointing out that there are certain categories of actions (e.g., move, standard, full round, free, non-action, swift and immediate) and certain kinds of sub types of those actions (attack, movement, full attack, charge, etc.) will only aid in the people understand what the rules are actually saying. So I appologize for not really making it clear what I was talking about earlier. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Iterative Attacks for Monsters
Top