Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 2643026" data-attributes="member: 6939">Not quite. For example, it is more likely you will get 70 charges than 30 charges, and more likely to get 100 charges than 20 charges. Sort of.... assuming you are talking about the 20-12-10-8-6 version... you will have a lot more way above compared to way below. It is not an even distribution about the median. Sticking with the 20-12-10-8-6 method is almost always going to lead to an overall power up. Again the 'winners' will be higher than the 'losers are low. So if 4 of 10 are betwenn 45-55, then one will be at 42 and one at 39, one at 35, and one at 65 and one at 85, and one at 95.I would still recommend looking at the 20-12-8-6-4 method. It will give 50 charges per wand (on average), and give you the 'last minute' edginess of having the D4. While it is likely not a game breaker, I don't see why folks want to give out more than 50 charges per wand. Study it as economics, and not math. The 'opportunity cost' of a dollar just isn't that much, but the potential payoff.... Now, the ones I don't understand are those spending 50-100-150 dollars a *week* on lottery tickets.</blockquote>