Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
It's a whip.... and ?....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kahuna Burger" data-source="post: 1633288" data-attributes="member: 8439"><p>I'd disagree with that intepretation entirely. I have seen nothing to indicate that armor is assumed to cover the whole body equally (for simplicity's sake or otherwise) simply that there is no mechanical way to represent aiming for an uncovered area. (or no mechanical benifit to doing so). You may hit one or you may not. A chain shirt explicity does not cover the legs (hence the difference between that and full chain) and provides a lower armor bonus. When you score a hit against that armor type, you may have penatrated the armor, or you may have struck an area unprotected by the armor. When you crit a guy in full plate you may have swung hard enough to stab right through it, or you may have stabbed him through the eye. Even natural armor is not on the eyes, nose or all areas equally. A sling stone also will not penatrate an iron plate, nor will any non magical dagger. Claiming that being made of braided leather has anything to do with the whip's damage is only a justification, it provides no explaination for why it is statted that way.</p><p></p><p>Consider that the neccassary +1 armor bonus for a whip to do no damage can be provided by a light shield. Do you think that DMs generally assume that a light sheild covers every inch of the body equally and every hit scored has resulted from a weapon going right through the shield? Most who bother to describe the attacks will say that a miss due to shield bonus was deflected by it, but a hit in spite of shield bonus hit him on the exposed side. </p><p></p><p>A whip could hit an armored fighter in the face, or wrap around an arm and wrench it to do similar damage to a bludgeoning weapon. A crit/sneak attack with a whip which does enough damage to kill has wrapped right around the neck and broken it with a quick yank. I think you could easily houserule that whips do leathal damage on a crit or when used with a successful sneak attack, two cases which explicitly assume striking a vulnerable area. In both cases, and with magical whips of any sort I would also ignore the armor bonus restrictions. (I would ignore them in general, but thats a bit more extreme house rule.)</p><p></p><p>Kahuna Burger</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kahuna Burger, post: 1633288, member: 8439"] I'd disagree with that intepretation entirely. I have seen nothing to indicate that armor is assumed to cover the whole body equally (for simplicity's sake or otherwise) simply that there is no mechanical way to represent aiming for an uncovered area. (or no mechanical benifit to doing so). You may hit one or you may not. A chain shirt explicity does not cover the legs (hence the difference between that and full chain) and provides a lower armor bonus. When you score a hit against that armor type, you may have penatrated the armor, or you may have struck an area unprotected by the armor. When you crit a guy in full plate you may have swung hard enough to stab right through it, or you may have stabbed him through the eye. Even natural armor is not on the eyes, nose or all areas equally. A sling stone also will not penatrate an iron plate, nor will any non magical dagger. Claiming that being made of braided leather has anything to do with the whip's damage is only a justification, it provides no explaination for why it is statted that way. Consider that the neccassary +1 armor bonus for a whip to do no damage can be provided by a light shield. Do you think that DMs generally assume that a light sheild covers every inch of the body equally and every hit scored has resulted from a weapon going right through the shield? Most who bother to describe the attacks will say that a miss due to shield bonus was deflected by it, but a hit in spite of shield bonus hit him on the exposed side. A whip could hit an armored fighter in the face, or wrap around an arm and wrench it to do similar damage to a bludgeoning weapon. A crit/sneak attack with a whip which does enough damage to kill has wrapped right around the neck and broken it with a quick yank. I think you could easily houserule that whips do leathal damage on a crit or when used with a successful sneak attack, two cases which explicitly assume striking a vulnerable area. In both cases, and with magical whips of any sort I would also ignore the armor bonus restrictions. (I would ignore them in general, but thats a bit more extreme house rule.) Kahuna Burger [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
It's a whip.... and ?....
Top