Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 4988438" data-attributes="member: 29112">So you're thinking, yes. Me, I've *never* heard such a thing, on- or offline. Until now, that is.I think it's more likely that the vast majority of 3e DMs have had one of the following attitudes towards it all: a) don't know; b) don't even care in the first place; c) look at everything not 'core' as suspect, and quite possibly power creep; d) listen to (and agree with) the many vocal types online repeating the mantra of CoDzilla and Wizards being teh zupapowaz; or e) go through everything for themselves, sorting out what's what, according to their own needs, preferences, opinions, etc. And if we're talking 'e' here in any particular case, I seriously doubt they'd start by nerfing the Sorcerer! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> (for example) - I mean, they're a whole spellcasting level behind all the other full casters. . . ouch. . . and that's right there in front of them, one of the first things they'd see.Also, traditional 'Vancian' casting isn't hard to understand, IME. I'm saying this as a DM who has introduced a fair few players to 3e, over several years. Sure, YMMV, and I respect that. But, what you're saying doesn't necessarily apply beyond your own experiences. Or maybe, not very far. *shrug*</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Aus_Snow, post: 4988438, member: 29112"] So you're thinking, yes. Me, I've *never* heard such a thing, on- or offline. Until now, that is. I think it's more likely that the vast majority of 3e DMs have had one of the following attitudes towards it all: a) don't know; b) don't even care in the first place; c) look at everything not 'core' as suspect, and quite possibly power creep; d) listen to (and agree with) the many vocal types online repeating the mantra of CoDzilla and Wizards being teh zupapowaz; or e) go through everything for themselves, sorting out what's what, according to their own needs, preferences, opinions, etc. And if we're talking 'e' here in any particular case, I seriously doubt they'd start by nerfing the Sorcerer! :lol: (for example) - I mean, they're a whole spellcasting level behind all the other full casters. . . [B]ouch[/B]. . . and that's right there in front of them, one of the first things they'd see. Also, traditional 'Vancian' casting isn't hard to understand, IME. I'm saying this as a DM who has introduced a fair few players to 3e, over several years. Sure, YMMV, and I respect that. But, what you're saying doesn't necessarily apply beyond your own experiences. Or maybe, not very far. *shrug* [/QUOTE]

Verification