Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jmucchiello" data-source="post: 439160" data-attributes="member: 813">We're actually only a little short on Wizards. We've had two Bards and both players hated them. (I was always a bard in 2nd ed and I've avoided the 3rd ed bard completely. I almost played Monte's bard in a game but it didn't start yet.) It's funny our long time Druid hasn't touched the 3rd ed Druid class. Our longtime Ranger has a Paladin and a Bard but no rangers. Not even a one-level switch away ranger. We have monks and fighers. A ranger and the afore-mentioned paladin. A barbarian or two. General other class coverage.Actually, the thing we haven't got is a Fighter/Wizard (or Sorcerer). That was so common in 2nd ed but seems non-existant in 3rd ed. I think it's because spellcasters get hosed if the multiclass evenly. My favorite 2nd ed combos (besides bards) were mage/cleric or druid combos. Can't do it and be even remotely useful at high level anymore.Where are you at in NJ? And where did you find a group of non-munchkins in NJ?Joe MucchielloThrowing Dice Games</blockquote>