Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
It's official, WOTC hates Rangers (Tasha's version of Favored Foe is GARBAGE)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Asisreo" data-source="post: 8121161" data-attributes="member: 7019027"><p>I feel the Exploration pillar of the game is being given a complete disservice in this discussion of late. There's some things I'd like to address. </p><p></p><p>The Exploration Pillar is supported quite well, all things considered. And I mean, <strong>all</strong> things considered. </p><p></p><p>There's this sort of separation of pillars in these discussions that really doesn't exist as much as it seems. While it may seem that "combat is codified with rules that exploration and social doesn't have," this is just incorrect. </p><p></p><p>A common example is that "Combat has AC, saves, and HP. What are the 'exploration HP, AC, and saves?'" The answer is that it's HP, AC, and Saves. These things don't disappear when combat is over, and can be quite relevant out-of-combat. The easiest example is traps and hazards. Certain traps will target saves and AC to reduce your HP and its entirely possible to reduce a character to 0 from exploration without even a hint of initiative. </p><p></p><p>Even in combat, there are actions entirely devoted to the exploration pillar like Interactions, Use an Object, and Search. Spells have uses both out-and-in combat. Even fireball can burn things down so long as they're flammable. </p><p></p><p>To say that there isn't any rules for exploration just isn't true. Background features, tools, vehicles, travel pace, most ability checks, feats, etc. The player's handbook in itself is full of exploration rules. </p><p></p><p>Another issue is that exploration isn't fairly judged based on the content that it has. Combat has some rules, but a game of generic HP sacks with standard movement, saves, attacks, and tactics will be boring. Likewise, a bog-standard exploration with generic roads, traps, hazards, lore, environments, and treasure will be boring too. </p><p></p><p>The next question which may be asked is "Why, then, is their a monster manual but not an 'Exploration Manual.' Why isn't their any exploration 'monsters' which I can plug into my game and not worry about homebrewing from scratch?" The good news is, that does exist in various forms. You have to look at the setting books and modules. For example, an example module of exploration was Tomb of Annihilation, which features Chult. You can homebrew your own densely populated and dangerous jungle, or you can open ToA and plop Chult down right where you need it to be. You can adjust the size, shape, NPC's, etc. Or you can keep things as they are and just run it. </p><p></p><p>Either way, its not as if exploration is devoid of fun, interesting rules. Its just these rules can be entangled into combat (or the social pillar, which is another topic).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Asisreo, post: 8121161, member: 7019027"] I feel the Exploration pillar of the game is being given a complete disservice in this discussion of late. There's some things I'd like to address. The Exploration Pillar is supported quite well, all things considered. And I mean, [B]all[/B] things considered. There's this sort of separation of pillars in these discussions that really doesn't exist as much as it seems. While it may seem that "combat is codified with rules that exploration and social doesn't have," this is just incorrect. A common example is that "Combat has AC, saves, and HP. What are the 'exploration HP, AC, and saves?'" The answer is that it's HP, AC, and Saves. These things don't disappear when combat is over, and can be quite relevant out-of-combat. The easiest example is traps and hazards. Certain traps will target saves and AC to reduce your HP and its entirely possible to reduce a character to 0 from exploration without even a hint of initiative. Even in combat, there are actions entirely devoted to the exploration pillar like Interactions, Use an Object, and Search. Spells have uses both out-and-in combat. Even fireball can burn things down so long as they're flammable. To say that there isn't any rules for exploration just isn't true. Background features, tools, vehicles, travel pace, most ability checks, feats, etc. The player's handbook in itself is full of exploration rules. Another issue is that exploration isn't fairly judged based on the content that it has. Combat has some rules, but a game of generic HP sacks with standard movement, saves, attacks, and tactics will be boring. Likewise, a bog-standard exploration with generic roads, traps, hazards, lore, environments, and treasure will be boring too. The next question which may be asked is "Why, then, is their a monster manual but not an 'Exploration Manual.' Why isn't their any exploration 'monsters' which I can plug into my game and not worry about homebrewing from scratch?" The good news is, that does exist in various forms. You have to look at the setting books and modules. For example, an example module of exploration was Tomb of Annihilation, which features Chult. You can homebrew your own densely populated and dangerous jungle, or you can open ToA and plop Chult down right where you need it to be. You can adjust the size, shape, NPC's, etc. Or you can keep things as they are and just run it. Either way, its not as if exploration is devoid of fun, interesting rules. Its just these rules can be entangled into combat (or the social pillar, which is another topic). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
It's official, WOTC hates Rangers (Tasha's version of Favored Foe is GARBAGE)
Top