Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tovec" data-source="post: 5543507" data-attributes="member: 95493">All of these are pretty much what you get with unarmed strike as it already is. Granted they don't have the same effects, so I guess if you want some special stuff write up some feats and houserule them.This does too much damage for a medium creature. I think I remember seeing somewhere if its a natural attack that they are capable of performing that they do not normally that you go with a lesser damage dice (so 1d2) and a -5 attack. That is in addition to the 1/2 STR, iirc. But I might also institute the defender is confused for 1 round because you are biting him and he doesn't understand why.EDIT: @<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=6672910" target="_blank">Dingo333</a> I'm sorry, my example of slam from TV was to try and give you a visual to along with the attack. Yes I realize I said that on TV they went flying and that is a separate check. The general idea I was trying to instill (beyond the semantics you got caught up in) was that a Slam attack is a greater hit than flinging your body at someone. I may be mistaken. Maybe every creature should have a slam attack. I can't speak to that. I know that not all creatures do have one so I trust the fact it has never come up before and don't equate slam with tackling (or body slamming) someone.I wouldn't be opposed to giving you (that human fighter) a slam attack  with a 1d4 (which is an increase in damage dice from the normal 1d3). I  have been in a fight. I know that very little damage is done from the  Tackle itself (perhaps winded?) but more so from being knocked to the ground and  being pummeled with the other guy's fists.</blockquote>

Verification