Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
It's time WotC fill us in on their digital initiative
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thurbane" data-source="post: 3469656" data-attributes="member: 43273"><p>Effectively means that due directly to a decision by WotC, the magazines will no longer be available after a few short months. Yes, I do credit WotC somewhat for allowing the adventure path to conclude before the magazine ceases publication.</p><p>As I've said numerous times, switching to an online format may or may not be a sound financial decision. Causing a large amount of ill-will in your consumer base, which could largely have been avoided (or at the very least, mitigated) with a bit of forward thinking and more effort to allay fears and mis-speculation is NOT a wise path to follow, in my opinion.</p><p>In effect, the ceasing of Paizo's license, and their subsequent announcement of such, was the communities "breaking news" that 2 icons of the hobby had been "axed".</p><p></p><p>If it were my business, I would already have something in place to show clients to allay their fears upon hearing that a service is to be discontinued. And then to remain totally silent while the furor grew seems like simple, bad PR to me.</p><p></p><p>The reminsiscing of staff members, while a somewhat interest read, does little to mollify hurt feelings, lost trust, or apprehension at a lack of solid info.</p><p>Yes, I do consider the official announcments that WotC have given us to this point "crumbs". Very little info has been given on any of the specifics of their "online initiative". How WotC could not have foreseen the initial negative reaction of the online (and general) community in reagrds to the announcmenet is baffling. Either that, or they foresaw it, and chose a "let it fester, then simmer down" approach. Either way, it does not instaill me with confidence or goodwill towards the company.</p><p>Buzz words are great, aren't they. To call the genuine dismay and disillusionment of a large portion of the D&D fanbase "geek rage" is trivializing it, and, quite frankly, insulting.</p><p></p><p>Your snide and disengenuous remarks aside, I think you, much like WotC themselves, are severely underestimating the backlash from gamers who prefer print magazines to online content.</p><p></p><p>Speaking solely for myself, as someone who has purchased a LOT of TSR and WotC material over the past 20+ years, their handling of this whole affair will directly affect my willingness to purchase future WotC products.</p><p></p><p>I am happy for people who prefer online content, and do hope that the new product proves useful and enjoyable for you. This doesn't change my dismay at the discontionuation of two great and iconic publications, nor does it change my anger and disappointment at the (perceived or otherwise) poor handling of this by WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thurbane, post: 3469656, member: 43273"] Effectively means that due directly to a decision by WotC, the magazines will no longer be available after a few short months. Yes, I do credit WotC somewhat for allowing the adventure path to conclude before the magazine ceases publication. As I've said numerous times, switching to an online format may or may not be a sound financial decision. Causing a large amount of ill-will in your consumer base, which could largely have been avoided (or at the very least, mitigated) with a bit of forward thinking and more effort to allay fears and mis-speculation is NOT a wise path to follow, in my opinion. In effect, the ceasing of Paizo's license, and their subsequent announcement of such, was the communities "breaking news" that 2 icons of the hobby had been "axed". If it were my business, I would already have something in place to show clients to allay their fears upon hearing that a service is to be discontinued. And then to remain totally silent while the furor grew seems like simple, bad PR to me. The reminsiscing of staff members, while a somewhat interest read, does little to mollify hurt feelings, lost trust, or apprehension at a lack of solid info. Yes, I do consider the official announcments that WotC have given us to this point "crumbs". Very little info has been given on any of the specifics of their "online initiative". How WotC could not have foreseen the initial negative reaction of the online (and general) community in reagrds to the announcmenet is baffling. Either that, or they foresaw it, and chose a "let it fester, then simmer down" approach. Either way, it does not instaill me with confidence or goodwill towards the company. Buzz words are great, aren't they. To call the genuine dismay and disillusionment of a large portion of the D&D fanbase "geek rage" is trivializing it, and, quite frankly, insulting. Your snide and disengenuous remarks aside, I think you, much like WotC themselves, are severely underestimating the backlash from gamers who prefer print magazines to online content. Speaking solely for myself, as someone who has purchased a LOT of TSR and WotC material over the past 20+ years, their handling of this whole affair will directly affect my willingness to purchase future WotC products. I am happy for people who prefer online content, and do hope that the new product proves useful and enjoyable for you. This doesn't change my dismay at the discontionuation of two great and iconic publications, nor does it change my anger and disappointment at the (perceived or otherwise) poor handling of this by WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
It's time WotC fill us in on their digital initiative
Top