Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aus_Snow" data-source="post: 5392371" data-attributes="member: 29112">Sorry, should've been more clear: I'd heard of it, but I have never seen a copy, let alone read (or used) the thing. It sounds intriguing, but not sufficiently that I'll be tracking it down any time soon. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Mainly because I have too many damn books and boxes as it is. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":o" title="Eek!    :o"  data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":o" />Actually, it's just the 4th edition itself. No supplement springs to mind, for any edition.It's unique in that way, as I mentioned. Most gamers, it seems, prefer any but that one, yet I find it has a certain charm, and well, utility. I don't see it as a means for players to go stomping all over Arthurian legends with clerics, druids and the lot. If anyone tried it, with the magic system presented, they would be sorely disappointed. Mostly, it's for NPCs anyway. But of course, that rests with the GM. You could certainly run a "party" of spellcasters, such as they are, using just the fourth ed. Pendragon corebook.Not much use in your current situation though, I suspect. Translating it to PF would be more like switching systems, in the end, given how very magic-heavy - intricately and iconically so, at that - the game is, at its core.But then, who am I to say. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> After all, I've used supps such as Miracles & Wonders, to replace pseudo-Vancian divine casting in 3e. And gone much further than that, while I was at it... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid    :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" />I'll try to think of some way I can be helpful. Wouldn't hold your breath, mind you. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

Verification