Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I've reversed my stance on dragonborn and tieflings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rounser" data-source="post: 3966769" data-attributes="member: 1106"><p>What's the warlock then? Chopped liver? There's more than enough emo in that to feed your Black Parade fantasies on for some time. Oh the angst, where is my scarf and black-rimmed glasses? I can't see past this fringe to slit my wrists.</p><p></p><p>Let's own up, horns look cool in promotional artwork. That's the real reason. Or some survey revealed that +2 to dex and int was more popular than +2 to wis and cha, because I'm sure 3E players had flavour in mind when powerbuilding their PCs.</p><p></p><p>Sorry, just a bit cynical about it all...and I picked the tiefling as the "new drow" and all, but note that the drow wasn't in the core. Maybe it should have been. Drow and elf, tiefling and aasimar - remove "eladrin" and dragonborn and there's a nice symmetry there, with less arbitrary D&Disms, because both sides of the coin are present, giving balanced flavour to match that balanced crunch which is oh-so-important.</p><p></p><p>For bonus points, rename tiefling and aasimar to demonblood and angelblood or something, so they're self-explanatory. Or use proper english, like cambion. Words that "survive" in english are generally better than anything you care to fabricate, because they've passed a usability test. They sound proper, unlike "eladrin" for instance.</p><p></p><p>Overall a much better core than what we're getting, IMO, and I've only spent the time typing here in thinking about it. That probably shows, but it seems no less arbitrary than what we're being presented with, surveys or not.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of surveys, are dragonborn born out of the newbie players who know nothing about the game saying, "Dungeons and Dragons? Okay, I want to be a dragon!" Because you're not really giving them that with dragonborn. Give them the real thing, say I, give them a playable dragon. Permutate them into a playable PC. It would be genuinely less intrusive than dragonborn are, and dilute the game's dragons less than this does. Water water everywhere but not a drop to drink....Draconic everything but the dragons themselves.</p><p></p><p>The only other reason why "survey says dragon-races are in" is probably for powergaming reasons (i.e. 3E half-dragon powers and stat gains), or related to that marketing radar blip that books with "dragon" in the title sell more. Both bad reasons to compromise the IP in the core IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rounser, post: 3966769, member: 1106"] What's the warlock then? Chopped liver? There's more than enough emo in that to feed your Black Parade fantasies on for some time. Oh the angst, where is my scarf and black-rimmed glasses? I can't see past this fringe to slit my wrists. Let's own up, horns look cool in promotional artwork. That's the real reason. Or some survey revealed that +2 to dex and int was more popular than +2 to wis and cha, because I'm sure 3E players had flavour in mind when powerbuilding their PCs. Sorry, just a bit cynical about it all...and I picked the tiefling as the "new drow" and all, but note that the drow wasn't in the core. Maybe it should have been. Drow and elf, tiefling and aasimar - remove "eladrin" and dragonborn and there's a nice symmetry there, with less arbitrary D&Disms, because both sides of the coin are present, giving balanced flavour to match that balanced crunch which is oh-so-important. For bonus points, rename tiefling and aasimar to demonblood and angelblood or something, so they're self-explanatory. Or use proper english, like cambion. Words that "survive" in english are generally better than anything you care to fabricate, because they've passed a usability test. They sound proper, unlike "eladrin" for instance. Overall a much better core than what we're getting, IMO, and I've only spent the time typing here in thinking about it. That probably shows, but it seems no less arbitrary than what we're being presented with, surveys or not. Speaking of surveys, are dragonborn born out of the newbie players who know nothing about the game saying, "Dungeons and Dragons? Okay, I want to be a dragon!" Because you're not really giving them that with dragonborn. Give them the real thing, say I, give them a playable dragon. Permutate them into a playable PC. It would be genuinely less intrusive than dragonborn are, and dilute the game's dragons less than this does. Water water everywhere but not a drop to drink....Draconic everything but the dragons themselves. The only other reason why "survey says dragon-races are in" is probably for powergaming reasons (i.e. 3E half-dragon powers and stat gains), or related to that marketing radar blip that books with "dragon" in the title sell more. Both bad reasons to compromise the IP in the core IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I've reversed my stance on dragonborn and tieflings
Top