Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
James Wyatt + FR!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="humble minion" data-source="post: 3813305" data-attributes="member: 5948"><p>Not really sure what James Wyatt is saying there. It's a weird sort of post.</p><p></p><p>a) FR has a lot of history that needs to be taken into account, both in the game line and in novels</p><p>b) We hear your concerns</p><p>c) Decisions were made two years ago about the course of the new FR and we're not going to significantly change that now, regardless of your concerns (though we do hear them)</p><p>d) FR is a RSE-, NPC- and novel-driven setting and will remain so</p><p>e) Trust us</p><p></p><p>Yeah, I like James Wyatt, but this stinks of damage control.</p><p></p><p>It seems completely bizarre to me that they could have missed the point so badly. It's the drearily continual apocalypses redrawing the setting, the rampant NPC-dominance, and the novel line blatantly puppeteering the game line that seems to have cheesed most people off on the Realms. And they intend to solve this problem how? By several series of novels, in which NPCs deal with apocalypses that change the face of the Realms regardless of what havoc this may wreak on established games, AGAIN! </p><p></p><p>From what's written here (and I freely admit the possibility that either James Wyatt has explained it poorly, or I've understood it poorly, or that I'm making judgements based on insufficient information), the FR strategy group decided that the flavour of the Realms is defined by apocalyptic events in novels, and so therefore 4e FR must be ushered in with apocalyptic events in novels, while Eberron has no such requirement and can carry on quietly. Seems like putting the cart before the horse to me - the game line should drive the novels, not vice versa. Rather than butchering the setting, why not refocus the FR <em>novel line</em> to smaller-scale events, rather than continue on the current untenable course of redrawing the map of Faerun every few years because of all the bits that have been blown up in forgettable trilogies in the interim? It seems as if the novels are sacrosanct and the game line is an afterthought.</p><p></p><p>I'm trying to keep an open mind over the whole 4e/FR issue, but stuff like this doesn't make me any more hopeful...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="humble minion, post: 3813305, member: 5948"] Not really sure what James Wyatt is saying there. It's a weird sort of post. a) FR has a lot of history that needs to be taken into account, both in the game line and in novels b) We hear your concerns c) Decisions were made two years ago about the course of the new FR and we're not going to significantly change that now, regardless of your concerns (though we do hear them) d) FR is a RSE-, NPC- and novel-driven setting and will remain so e) Trust us Yeah, I like James Wyatt, but this stinks of damage control. It seems completely bizarre to me that they could have missed the point so badly. It's the drearily continual apocalypses redrawing the setting, the rampant NPC-dominance, and the novel line blatantly puppeteering the game line that seems to have cheesed most people off on the Realms. And they intend to solve this problem how? By several series of novels, in which NPCs deal with apocalypses that change the face of the Realms regardless of what havoc this may wreak on established games, AGAIN! From what's written here (and I freely admit the possibility that either James Wyatt has explained it poorly, or I've understood it poorly, or that I'm making judgements based on insufficient information), the FR strategy group decided that the flavour of the Realms is defined by apocalyptic events in novels, and so therefore 4e FR must be ushered in with apocalyptic events in novels, while Eberron has no such requirement and can carry on quietly. Seems like putting the cart before the horse to me - the game line should drive the novels, not vice versa. Rather than butchering the setting, why not refocus the FR [i]novel line[/i] to smaller-scale events, rather than continue on the current untenable course of redrawing the map of Faerun every few years because of all the bits that have been blown up in forgettable trilogies in the interim? It seems as if the novels are sacrosanct and the game line is an afterthought. I'm trying to keep an open mind over the whole 4e/FR issue, but stuff like this doesn't make me any more hopeful... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
James Wyatt + FR!?
Top