Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 6181615" data-attributes="member: 6668292">It was a lot of fun. They asked me to DM again tonight, so I actually ran another session. They all had a lot of fun with it, too, it seems.I was planning on running it like an alchemist's fire, more or less. I probably would have used page 42 to run it, and used the Normal Low damage expression (1d6+3 according to Quickleaf's document, I think). Perhaps if they have more expensive materials, I'll up the damage expression. But, it was just prior to their first combat ever with me, and they were thinking outside the box (the Wizard player hasn't played in 12 years, since she was 13 years old); I wasn't about to tell them no when I could do it using the useful page 42 rules without worrying about it breaking anything.Really, the Wizard would do more damage just using one of her powers, but this would just let her pass it off to the Monk (who could sneak up and throw it, and doesn't mind being up front). That seemed like a fair mechanical trade to me. It didn't work out for them, but they're keeping this kind of thing in mind while we play now, so it's all good. Twice so far the Monk player has said &quot;I'm using this&quot; and held up the &quot;Stunt&quot; power card I wrote up for each of them, before telling me what she's doing. As long as they keep it up, I see a lot of fun ahead <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 6181615, member: 6668292"] It was a lot of fun. They asked me to DM again tonight, so I actually ran another session. They all had a lot of fun with it, too, it seems. I was planning on running it like an alchemist's fire, more or less. I probably would have used page 42 to run it, and used the Normal Low damage expression (1d6+3 according to Quickleaf's document, I think). Perhaps if they have more expensive materials, I'll up the damage expression. But, it was just prior to their first combat ever with me, and they were thinking outside the box (the Wizard player hasn't played in 12 years, since she was 13 years old); I wasn't about to tell them no when I could do it using the useful page 42 rules without worrying about it breaking anything. Really, the Wizard would do more damage just using one of her powers, but this would just let her pass it off to the Monk (who could sneak up and throw it, and doesn't mind being up front). That seemed like a fair mechanical trade to me. It didn't work out for them, but they're keeping this kind of thing in mind while we play now, so it's all good. Twice so far the Monk player has said "I'm using this" and held up the "Stunt" power card I wrote up for each of them, before telling me what she's doing. As long as they keep it up, I see a lot of fun ahead :) [/QUOTE]

Verification