Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
January and Beyond!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5424671" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>It's not that big of a deal, but when choosing a race, it effectively makes it a less appealing choice, comparatively. It would have to come with some powerful abilities to make it appealing again, and it doesn't look like the rest of the Shade's package (from the preview, at least) is any better than the Eladrin's or the Gnome's or the Halfling's. So the person left choosing the Shade as their race is choosing it for purely thematic reasons (which is good!), but then is getting hit with a penalty for doing something thematic vs. something more mechanically sound (penalties for roleplaying? Baaad!).</p><p></p><p>I don't think it's a big deal, but if, in 6 months or so, WotC wonders why Shades don't have "traction," that one racial feature could be it. A penalty for choosing a race just doesn't endear that race to anyone. </p><p></p><p>Comparing it to Small is pretty fair, because it's only harmful to an archetype (They both hit Defenders, and Small hits Large Weapon Users and -1 Surge hits any melee build), but I think Small has too much genre-push to make it something that the game should try and do without. The same isn't necessarily true of -1 Surge. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, it's a datapoint. Not a huge deal if one more race doesn't get used that often. Join the Gnoll pile! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 5424671, member: 2067"] It's not that big of a deal, but when choosing a race, it effectively makes it a less appealing choice, comparatively. It would have to come with some powerful abilities to make it appealing again, and it doesn't look like the rest of the Shade's package (from the preview, at least) is any better than the Eladrin's or the Gnome's or the Halfling's. So the person left choosing the Shade as their race is choosing it for purely thematic reasons (which is good!), but then is getting hit with a penalty for doing something thematic vs. something more mechanically sound (penalties for roleplaying? Baaad!). I don't think it's a big deal, but if, in 6 months or so, WotC wonders why Shades don't have "traction," that one racial feature could be it. A penalty for choosing a race just doesn't endear that race to anyone. Comparing it to Small is pretty fair, because it's only harmful to an archetype (They both hit Defenders, and Small hits Large Weapon Users and -1 Surge hits any melee build), but I think Small has too much genre-push to make it something that the game should try and do without. The same isn't necessarily true of -1 Surge. Anyway, it's a datapoint. Not a huge deal if one more race doesn't get used that often. Join the Gnoll pile! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
January and Beyond!
Top