Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jason Bulmahn Speaks about DDXP(His take on the system)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nymrohd" data-source="post: 4090965" data-attributes="member: 59126"><p>When you work in a certain industry your opinions about changes in it automatically carry more weight to the consumer. The review format of picking on every single detail and if ever you mention anything positive you immediately have to invalidate it by making it ambiguous is unhelpful, not objective, if not downright passive aggresive. People who are involved in the business of making RPGs especially those who primarily work of D&D should exercise caution in presenting their opinions in a neutral manner.</p><p>Glowing reviews are even more unnerving; being overtly enthusiastic about something, even if it is the greatest thing in the world, will make your review sound biased and put people on the defensive about it. Some will embrace it, but that is confirmation bias.</p><p></p><p>I have no problem with reviewers being very critical; that's their job. But the tone and structure of a review are as much a part of it as the arguments and observations in it. </p><p></p><p>If you work in the RPG industry and want to write a review about 4E make certain that the feel of your review is dispassionate. I understand that you are likely emotionally invested in this game a lot more than the average player; choosing to work in this industry denotes that and you sure are not doing it for the money. But if you cannot divorce tone and feeling from argument and observation, you are doing a disservice to the community.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nymrohd, post: 4090965, member: 59126"] When you work in a certain industry your opinions about changes in it automatically carry more weight to the consumer. The review format of picking on every single detail and if ever you mention anything positive you immediately have to invalidate it by making it ambiguous is unhelpful, not objective, if not downright passive aggresive. People who are involved in the business of making RPGs especially those who primarily work of D&D should exercise caution in presenting their opinions in a neutral manner. Glowing reviews are even more unnerving; being overtly enthusiastic about something, even if it is the greatest thing in the world, will make your review sound biased and put people on the defensive about it. Some will embrace it, but that is confirmation bias. I have no problem with reviewers being very critical; that's their job. But the tone and structure of a review are as much a part of it as the arguments and observations in it. If you work in the RPG industry and want to write a review about 4E make certain that the feel of your review is dispassionate. I understand that you are likely emotionally invested in this game a lot more than the average player; choosing to work in this industry denotes that and you sure are not doing it for the money. But if you cannot divorce tone and feeling from argument and observation, you are doing a disservice to the community. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jason Bulmahn Speaks about DDXP(His take on the system)
Top