Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
JC Tweets: How Close to official rulings do you consider them to be?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="77IM" data-source="post: 7557745" data-attributes="member: 12377"><p>I think the terminology is confusing the question. There is no such thing as "official." There are only the rules my table agrees on, and the sources that informs them. The core books are a source, but so are supplements, 3rdparty stuff, discussions on ENWorld, Sage Advice, designer tweets, and conversations I have around the FLGS. These are all sources of rules that my table might adopt.</p><p></p><p>I think the better question is: how influential are Crawford's tweets, as a source? At my table, they have about as much weight as conversations I have with random people at my FLGS. So I chose the third poll option, "no closer to official than something a bum off the street would say," because that seemed like the closest option. Although to be fair to the people to the people at my FLGS, I don't think any of them are actual bums.</p><p></p><p>The most influential source, by far, are the core books. Not because they are "official" but because they are so widely read that they make a really great starting-point for a set of rules for my table to agree upon. Most people don't read the tweets, the Sage Advice, ENWorld, or even the "official" supplements, and I don't think it's fair to expect people to agree upon rules they haven't read and might not have access to. (The DMG and the MM are in a weird place here: many players haven't read them, but agree to trust the DM to run the game by these rules, anyway.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="77IM, post: 7557745, member: 12377"] I think the terminology is confusing the question. There is no such thing as "official." There are only the rules my table agrees on, and the sources that informs them. The core books are a source, but so are supplements, 3rdparty stuff, discussions on ENWorld, Sage Advice, designer tweets, and conversations I have around the FLGS. These are all sources of rules that my table might adopt. I think the better question is: how influential are Crawford's tweets, as a source? At my table, they have about as much weight as conversations I have with random people at my FLGS. So I chose the third poll option, "no closer to official than something a bum off the street would say," because that seemed like the closest option. Although to be fair to the people to the people at my FLGS, I don't think any of them are actual bums. The most influential source, by far, are the core books. Not because they are "official" but because they are so widely read that they make a really great starting-point for a set of rules for my table to agree upon. Most people don't read the tweets, the Sage Advice, ENWorld, or even the "official" supplements, and I don't think it's fair to expect people to agree upon rules they haven't read and might not have access to. (The DMG and the MM are in a weird place here: many players haven't read them, but agree to trust the DM to run the game by these rules, anyway.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
JC Tweets: How Close to official rulings do you consider them to be?
Top