Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8112824" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Their strong tradition of magic gives them Dexterity? Obviously not, it gives them a +1 Int.... the exact same a human with no strong tradition of magic.</p><p></p><p>And Hobgoblins, who have not generally been seen as masters of Arcane Power.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Under this interpretation though, Tasha's rules are even more imperative. How am I supposed to show a rebel against elven traditions if I can't change the stats that are derived from those traditions? </p><p></p><p>And how would we show different elves of different traditions, if not by the ability to move scores? I'm sure the elves of Athas are not like the elves of Faerun, so they would have different stats. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you think this gives you that much insight, you may be reading too deep into it. </p><p></p><p>I mean, if I assume the racial traits are true the conversation would go</p><p></p><p>"He is wearing armor, wizards don't wear armor. He must be a cleric"</p><p></p><p>"Fool, he's a dwarf, all dwarves wear armor into battle. He isn't wearing any religious iconography, why would he be a cleric?"</p><p></p><p>"A fighter then."</p><p></p><p>"With no shield and wielding a staff? Use your head, that's an arcane focus. This guys a mage for sure." </p><p></p><p></p><p>After all, this is literally the type of conversation my players would have. So, some INT 16 monsters should be able to follow that same logic with no issue. Also, there is version two</p><p></p><p>"He's a fighter get him"</p><p></p><p><em>fireball</em></p><p></p><p>"He's a Wizard, gank him!"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm sorry, you lost me. </p><p></p><p>No player will intentionally gimp their character. </p><p>But, playing a Dwarf Wizard or Elf Strength Fighter isn't a bad thing, even with their lower scores, because of whatever reason you want to give. </p><p></p><p>But, with Tasha's they now have a choice to bump those scores, from scores that weren't a bad thing to an optimized version...</p><p></p><p>And if they don't do it they are gimping their character... which they weren't doing by... I don't know, playing an un-optimized race to start with? </p><p></p><p>In fact, Oofta specifically wants scores less than 16, to prove his point that having a score less than 16 doesn't matter... yet at the same time if given a choice he would never chose to have a score less than 16.... </p><p></p><p>You guys are arguing in circles by this point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where is the race for B, because unless he is a Half-Orc, there is no way to get that trait. </p><p></p><p>This is like arguing every race will now start with Great Weapon Master. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And, I honestly hate this argument that without a +2 Strength +1 Con a half-orc is only a human in a rubber mask. Because then.... what do we call a Goliath (+2 Strength +1 Con) an Orc (+2 Strength +1 Con), or a Minotaur (+2 Strength +1 Con). There are four races with this exact same stat array. Does that mean that a Minotaur is just a half-orc with some fake horns glued on? Or are they really Goliaths? </p><p></p><p>I mean, take those scores away, and they are just humans, because they all have the same scores. So, having all the same scores now means they are unidentifiable as being different right?</p><p></p><p>Same with Elves, that +2 Dexterity and +1 Wisdom is the exact same as multiple halfings (Ghostwise, Loutsadan, and the Jorasco), Aaracrockra, and Kenku. Are these races really the exact same? Just rubber masks that the elves can wear? </p><p></p><p>No. They aren't. They never have been. And this insistence that they will be just seems completely unfounded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8112824, member: 6801228"] Their strong tradition of magic gives them Dexterity? Obviously not, it gives them a +1 Int.... the exact same a human with no strong tradition of magic. And Hobgoblins, who have not generally been seen as masters of Arcane Power. Under this interpretation though, Tasha's rules are even more imperative. How am I supposed to show a rebel against elven traditions if I can't change the stats that are derived from those traditions? And how would we show different elves of different traditions, if not by the ability to move scores? I'm sure the elves of Athas are not like the elves of Faerun, so they would have different stats. If you think this gives you that much insight, you may be reading too deep into it. I mean, if I assume the racial traits are true the conversation would go "He is wearing armor, wizards don't wear armor. He must be a cleric" "Fool, he's a dwarf, all dwarves wear armor into battle. He isn't wearing any religious iconography, why would he be a cleric?" "A fighter then." "With no shield and wielding a staff? Use your head, that's an arcane focus. This guys a mage for sure." After all, this is literally the type of conversation my players would have. So, some INT 16 monsters should be able to follow that same logic with no issue. Also, there is version two "He's a fighter get him" [I]fireball[/I] "He's a Wizard, gank him!" I'm sorry, you lost me. No player will intentionally gimp their character. But, playing a Dwarf Wizard or Elf Strength Fighter isn't a bad thing, even with their lower scores, because of whatever reason you want to give. But, with Tasha's they now have a choice to bump those scores, from scores that weren't a bad thing to an optimized version... And if they don't do it they are gimping their character... which they weren't doing by... I don't know, playing an un-optimized race to start with? In fact, Oofta specifically wants scores less than 16, to prove his point that having a score less than 16 doesn't matter... yet at the same time if given a choice he would never chose to have a score less than 16.... You guys are arguing in circles by this point. Where is the race for B, because unless he is a Half-Orc, there is no way to get that trait. This is like arguing every race will now start with Great Weapon Master. And, I honestly hate this argument that without a +2 Strength +1 Con a half-orc is only a human in a rubber mask. Because then.... what do we call a Goliath (+2 Strength +1 Con) an Orc (+2 Strength +1 Con), or a Minotaur (+2 Strength +1 Con). There are four races with this exact same stat array. Does that mean that a Minotaur is just a half-orc with some fake horns glued on? Or are they really Goliaths? I mean, take those scores away, and they are just humans, because they all have the same scores. So, having all the same scores now means they are unidentifiable as being different right? Same with Elves, that +2 Dexterity and +1 Wisdom is the exact same as multiple halfings (Ghostwise, Loutsadan, and the Jorasco), Aaracrockra, and Kenku. Are these races really the exact same? Just rubber masks that the elves can wear? No. They aren't. They never have been. And this insistence that they will be just seems completely unfounded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
Top