Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreenTengu" data-source="post: 8114002" data-attributes="member: 6777454"><p>All the fretting about small races with 20 strength is amusing. Do the people complaining about that have access to a different D&D 5E than me?</p><p></p><p>Who would even bother making such a character? Strength is never worth taking in this edition unless you are using a 2-handed martial weapon. Otherwise? Always go Dex.</p><p></p><p>Dexterity is THE initiative stat. It is the primary defensive stat (ac and most frequent save), it is THE stat for ranged combat and works just as well for melee combat as strength. Dexterity also has the best combat skill attached to it-- stealth.</p><p></p><p>You have to pump your Dex to max to be a good Rogue or Monk, there is no substitute. But Dex freely substitutes in for Str if you are a Fighter, it is in fact the superior build, and the extra bonuses that come with it probably make it the better choice for Paladin too. And while I haven't seen a Dex-based Barbarian, I suspect getting to utilize stealth and acrobatics and getting better Dex saves probably means it, at worst, breaks even.</p><p></p><p>Seriously-- the DM could houserule combining Strength and Constitution into one stat and characters would still be better off boosting Dexterity.</p><p></p><p>So who is going to take strength (or Con) on their character if they can take Dexterity instead?</p><p></p><p>And finally-- do you know what effect being "small" has? I bet you are thinking it boosts or AC or helps you to hide or improves escape artist or-- no.</p><p></p><p>It just means you can't use two-handed martial weapons. You know-- the only weapon option that requires one to use Strength instead of Dex and thus the only reason to bother putting a single point into Strength in the entire edition. And that supposed 20 Strength Halfling or Gnome can't even use them anyway. (Oh, they also do crappier in grapple checks, but no one uses those anyway.)</p><p></p><p>So why all the fuss about a build no one is going to take rather than all the Dex 20 Dwarfs, Orcs and Tieflings that will now come flooding in?</p><p></p><p>I suspect we will be seeing way more parties where not only does no one have an Intelligence higher than 10, no one will have a Strength higher than 10 either. All characters, regardless of race or class, will be max dex and max cha.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreenTengu, post: 8114002, member: 6777454"] All the fretting about small races with 20 strength is amusing. Do the people complaining about that have access to a different D&D 5E than me? Who would even bother making such a character? Strength is never worth taking in this edition unless you are using a 2-handed martial weapon. Otherwise? Always go Dex. Dexterity is THE initiative stat. It is the primary defensive stat (ac and most frequent save), it is THE stat for ranged combat and works just as well for melee combat as strength. Dexterity also has the best combat skill attached to it-- stealth. You have to pump your Dex to max to be a good Rogue or Monk, there is no substitute. But Dex freely substitutes in for Str if you are a Fighter, it is in fact the superior build, and the extra bonuses that come with it probably make it the better choice for Paladin too. And while I haven't seen a Dex-based Barbarian, I suspect getting to utilize stealth and acrobatics and getting better Dex saves probably means it, at worst, breaks even. Seriously-- the DM could houserule combining Strength and Constitution into one stat and characters would still be better off boosting Dexterity. So who is going to take strength (or Con) on their character if they can take Dexterity instead? And finally-- do you know what effect being "small" has? I bet you are thinking it boosts or AC or helps you to hide or improves escape artist or-- no. It just means you can't use two-handed martial weapons. You know-- the only weapon option that requires one to use Strength instead of Dex and thus the only reason to bother putting a single point into Strength in the entire edition. And that supposed 20 Strength Halfling or Gnome can't even use them anyway. (Oh, they also do crappier in grapple checks, but no one uses those anyway.) So why all the fuss about a build no one is going to take rather than all the Dex 20 Dwarfs, Orcs and Tieflings that will now come flooding in? I suspect we will be seeing way more parties where not only does no one have an Intelligence higher than 10, no one will have a Strength higher than 10 either. All characters, regardless of race or class, will be max dex and max cha. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
Top