Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8118366" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Okay, now we are shifting. You originally said "I mean we wholeheartedly accept Star Treks' version of species"</p><p></p><p>And now we are at "you and some others don't, but the majority does," </p><p></p><p>So how do you know that the majority of DnD players wholeheartedly accept Star Trek's version of species? You seem to simply be presuming that your preference is widely held, which is not a stable footing. </p><p></p><p>Also, I find your second paragraph interesting. Because you seem to be advocating for an even more extreme position than anyone has taken. If there is a problem in DnD the solution might not be to change the lore, and it might not be to change the mechanics... it might be to make an entirely new game that isn't DnD. </p><p></p><p>That likely isn't what you meant, but I otherwise don't know what you could possibly mean in this context.</p><p></p><p>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except, also in print, those racial bonuses are only applied to PCs. </p><p></p><p>But, you are convinced WoTC is full of liars, so there is nothing more to be said here. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I will however, switch to something interesting I found. I was reading through a different thread and I noticed Max that you said something that relates to all of this. You mentioned that a 12 in dex was all that was needed to be graceful. </p><p></p><p>I find this an interesting position to take, because if I pull up a dice roller, and let us say we roll 3d6 straight for all Dwarves on Dex. Do you know what that spread looks like? 37.5% of all dwarves would have a dexterity of 12 or higher. Humans with their +1 to everything? 50%</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile 62.5% of elves would meet that requirement. </p><p></p><p>Now, I'm not entirely sure how to mathematically compare 37.5% to 50% to 62.5% to get the full implication of population numbers, but I find it interesting that less that 2/3 of all elves are currently "as graceful as an elf" while over 1/3 of Dwarves are, and humans are a 50/50 split over being "as graceful as an elf" </p><p></p><p>The largest difference in the game (+0 to +2 on the racial mod) works out to a 25% difference amongst the population. So, your elf, as I am reading these numbers based on your statement, is only 25% more likely to be "as graceful as an elf" as a dwarf is. </p><p></p><p>Interesting numbers.</p><p></p><p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I know that you have talked about lore a lot, but I thought I remembered you also saying that no one was talking about the races being indistiguishable without the racial ASI's. Helldrtich's post saying exactly that was my point. </p><p></p><p>And if you want to simply discuss how it will change the game.... More races that traditionally did not have +2 to the primary attribute of a class, being used in that class. </p><p></p><p>That is the only effect this will have on the game. Because as we keep showing, none of the rest of the game has ever been effected by the PC stats. And there is no reason to assume that will change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8118366, member: 6801228"] Okay, now we are shifting. You originally said "I mean we wholeheartedly accept Star Treks' version of species" And now we are at "you and some others don't, but the majority does," So how do you know that the majority of DnD players wholeheartedly accept Star Trek's version of species? You seem to simply be presuming that your preference is widely held, which is not a stable footing. Also, I find your second paragraph interesting. Because you seem to be advocating for an even more extreme position than anyone has taken. If there is a problem in DnD the solution might not be to change the lore, and it might not be to change the mechanics... it might be to make an entirely new game that isn't DnD. That likely isn't what you meant, but I otherwise don't know what you could possibly mean in this context. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Except, also in print, those racial bonuses are only applied to PCs. But, you are convinced WoTC is full of liars, so there is nothing more to be said here. I will however, switch to something interesting I found. I was reading through a different thread and I noticed Max that you said something that relates to all of this. You mentioned that a 12 in dex was all that was needed to be graceful. I find this an interesting position to take, because if I pull up a dice roller, and let us say we roll 3d6 straight for all Dwarves on Dex. Do you know what that spread looks like? 37.5% of all dwarves would have a dexterity of 12 or higher. Humans with their +1 to everything? 50% Meanwhile 62.5% of elves would meet that requirement. Now, I'm not entirely sure how to mathematically compare 37.5% to 50% to 62.5% to get the full implication of population numbers, but I find it interesting that less that 2/3 of all elves are currently "as graceful as an elf" while over 1/3 of Dwarves are, and humans are a 50/50 split over being "as graceful as an elf" The largest difference in the game (+0 to +2 on the racial mod) works out to a 25% difference amongst the population. So, your elf, as I am reading these numbers based on your statement, is only 25% more likely to be "as graceful as an elf" as a dwarf is. Interesting numbers. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I know that you have talked about lore a lot, but I thought I remembered you also saying that no one was talking about the races being indistiguishable without the racial ASI's. Helldrtich's post saying exactly that was my point. And if you want to simply discuss how it will change the game.... More races that traditionally did not have +2 to the primary attribute of a class, being used in that class. That is the only effect this will have on the game. Because as we keep showing, none of the rest of the game has ever been effected by the PC stats. And there is no reason to assume that will change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
Top