Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Christian" data-source="post: 8119243" data-attributes="member: 6901101"><p>And then they rewrote and changed the race... s... Oh wait. They didn't. </p><p></p><p>As I said, some will read that and gleam what they want. It does list those other things. We all know this. But the language clearly implies they biological, like age, size, speed, and special abilities. Of course language and alignment are learned. Common sense should tell you that. Just like it should tell you the biological features.</p><p>I have watched you argue with many on here. About how it only applies to PC's. Yet clearly the language in here states it is not just the PC's, but the entire race. </p><p>Lastly, you accuse me of cherry picking or not placing everything on the board. I listed the entire statements from all the races. All of the statements. To not list the other stuff is not to mislead, and you know that. We all know the PHB. It is to point out the language the writers used, and how that language clearly demonstrates exactly the opposite of what you have said. Here it is again:</p><p>"Your dwarf character has an assortment of <strong>inborn</strong> abilities, part and parcel of <strong>Dwarven nature</strong> - +2 con."</p><p>"Your elf character has a variety of <strong>natural</strong> abilities, the result of thousands of years of elven refinement - +2 dex."</p><p>"You halfling character has a number of traits <strong>in common with all other halflings</strong> - +2 dex."</p><p>"It's hard to make generalizations about humans, but your human character has these traits - +1 for all abilities."</p><p>"Your draconic <strong>heritage</strong> manifests in a variety of <strong>traits you share with other dragonborn</strong> - +2 str."</p><p>"Your gnome character has certain <strong>characteristics in common with all other gnomes</strong> - +2 int."</p><p>"Your half-elf character has some qualities in <strong>common with elves</strong> and some that are <strong>unique to half-elves</strong> - +2 cha."</p><p>"Your half-orc character has certain <strong>traits deriving from your orc ancestry</strong> - +2 str."</p><p>"Tieflings <strong>share certain racial traits</strong> as a result of their <strong>infernal descent</strong> - +2 cha."</p><p></p><p>I will do what you did. Turning to one at random, the halfling states their traits are in common with <strong>all other</strong> halflings. Notice it doesn't say in common with all other halfling characters. It says halflings. Here is another random one: half-orc character has certain traits deriving from your orc <strong>ancestry</strong>. Read the passages and take what you want from them. But I said it earlier, it is disingenuous to play devil's advocate or argue for the sake of arguing without at least stating that is what you are doing. You are clearly wrong on this. Clearly. To say, "Huh, I didn't look at like that, but it is apparent that's what they meant," would be a mature step.</p><p></p><p>If you want to debate its effects or even how the cap institutes the irrelevance of solidified versus floating ASI's or how the lore will not change. That's cool. I'm all ears.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Christian, post: 8119243, member: 6901101"] And then they rewrote and changed the race... s... Oh wait. They didn't. As I said, some will read that and gleam what they want. It does list those other things. We all know this. But the language clearly implies they biological, like age, size, speed, and special abilities. Of course language and alignment are learned. Common sense should tell you that. Just like it should tell you the biological features. I have watched you argue with many on here. About how it only applies to PC's. Yet clearly the language in here states it is not just the PC's, but the entire race. Lastly, you accuse me of cherry picking or not placing everything on the board. I listed the entire statements from all the races. All of the statements. To not list the other stuff is not to mislead, and you know that. We all know the PHB. It is to point out the language the writers used, and how that language clearly demonstrates exactly the opposite of what you have said. Here it is again: "Your dwarf character has an assortment of [B]inborn[/B] abilities, part and parcel of [B]Dwarven nature[/B] - +2 con." "Your elf character has a variety of [B]natural[/B] abilities, the result of thousands of years of elven refinement - +2 dex." "You halfling character has a number of traits [B]in common with all other halflings[/B] - +2 dex." "It's hard to make generalizations about humans, but your human character has these traits - +1 for all abilities." "Your draconic [B]heritage[/B] manifests in a variety of [B]traits you share with other dragonborn[/B] - +2 str." "Your gnome character has certain [B]characteristics in common with all other gnomes[/B] - +2 int." "Your half-elf character has some qualities in [B]common with elves[/B] and some that are [B]unique to half-elves[/B] - +2 cha." "Your half-orc character has certain [B]traits deriving from your orc ancestry[/B] - +2 str." "Tieflings [B]share certain racial traits[/B] as a result of their [B]infernal descent[/B] - +2 cha." I will do what you did. Turning to one at random, the halfling states their traits are in common with [B]all other[/B] halflings. Notice it doesn't say in common with all other halfling characters. It says halflings. Here is another random one: half-orc character has certain traits deriving from your orc [B]ancestry[/B]. Read the passages and take what you want from them. But I said it earlier, it is disingenuous to play devil's advocate or argue for the sake of arguing without at least stating that is what you are doing. You are clearly wrong on this. Clearly. To say, "Huh, I didn't look at like that, but it is apparent that's what they meant," would be a mature step. If you want to debate its effects or even how the cap institutes the irrelevance of solidified versus floating ASI's or how the lore will not change. That's cool. I'm all ears. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford Discusses Details on Custom Origins
Top