Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford On The Dark Side of Developing 5E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trickster Spirit" data-source="post: 7667035" data-attributes="member: 6701829"><p>Eh, I'll respectfully disagree in that I do think that what we've seen so far has been the plan. They only have the manpower to work on a project or two at a time - maybe we would have had conversion docs already, or a hypothetical in-house hardcover to be released later this year would have been announced by now, if they hadn't lost one of their number to jury duty. But we were never going to get all that much more than what we are now. </p><p></p><p>I'd never accuse anyone who wants more D&D content of laziness or ineptitude, primarily because I myself would love to see more. But I don't <em>need</em> more to enjoy the excellent game that exists in front of me. In my view, 5E is complete, and any other material that comes out for it is gravy. I just got some new races and some bonus spells, and I'm an EN5ider patron so I've got more than enough to play with. While I don't begrudge anyone for wanting more from WotC, I also don't have any problems with WotC continuing on their present course. </p><p></p><p>I do have a problem with folks arguing that because <em>their</em> personal preferences aren't being satisfied, that the game is doomed or that WotC is mismanaging it. They're managing it fine as far as I can see.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually agree, in that I do think we'll see other properly playtested material than the APs come through eventually. But the emphasis is on "eventually". The pace is going to be much slower with such a small team. The Unearthed Arcana stuff is going to be rough and unpolished, but having the work done properly means waiting. There's no way around that that I can see - if they're not <em>currently</em> working on and playtesting an Eberron specific resource in secret for release some time in 2015, it means we've got a long time until we have something other than the rough draft to play with.</p><p></p><p>Again, even at the current release rate, I've got more than enough to occupy my attention, so I'm fine being patient. No setting-specific material until 2016? I can wait. 2019? I can wait til then, too. Etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not that they can't sell the products. They could, and probably make a decent profit off of them.</p><p></p><p>It's that they could invest that same budget into Magic instead, and see ridiculously higher returns.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trickster Spirit, post: 7667035, member: 6701829"] Eh, I'll respectfully disagree in that I do think that what we've seen so far has been the plan. They only have the manpower to work on a project or two at a time - maybe we would have had conversion docs already, or a hypothetical in-house hardcover to be released later this year would have been announced by now, if they hadn't lost one of their number to jury duty. But we were never going to get all that much more than what we are now. I'd never accuse anyone who wants more D&D content of laziness or ineptitude, primarily because I myself would love to see more. But I don't [i]need[/i] more to enjoy the excellent game that exists in front of me. In my view, 5E is complete, and any other material that comes out for it is gravy. I just got some new races and some bonus spells, and I'm an EN5ider patron so I've got more than enough to play with. While I don't begrudge anyone for wanting more from WotC, I also don't have any problems with WotC continuing on their present course. I do have a problem with folks arguing that because [i]their[/i] personal preferences aren't being satisfied, that the game is doomed or that WotC is mismanaging it. They're managing it fine as far as I can see. I actually agree, in that I do think we'll see other properly playtested material than the APs come through eventually. But the emphasis is on "eventually". The pace is going to be much slower with such a small team. The Unearthed Arcana stuff is going to be rough and unpolished, but having the work done properly means waiting. There's no way around that that I can see - if they're not [i]currently[/i] working on and playtesting an Eberron specific resource in secret for release some time in 2015, it means we've got a long time until we have something other than the rough draft to play with. Again, even at the current release rate, I've got more than enough to occupy my attention, so I'm fine being patient. No setting-specific material until 2016? I can wait. 2019? I can wait til then, too. Etc. It's not that they can't sell the products. They could, and probably make a decent profit off of them. It's that they could invest that same budget into Magic instead, and see ridiculously higher returns. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Jeremy Crawford On The Dark Side of Developing 5E
Top