Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
jgbrowning, Rystil Arden, and Hypersmurf talk amongst themselves
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pickaxe" data-source="post: 2153630" data-attributes="member: 10812"><p>How can someone be "out of touch" with something that's subjective? I agree that the spirit of the rules (which I believe is equivalent to what you are calling the common sense approach) is important, but I think you are missing two important points:</p><p></p><p>1) Hypersmurf is indeed taking an approach that considers the spirit of the rules, not just the "letter of the law." His iconic example is Shillelagh, where he identifies two possible interpretations of the RAW, and then essentially asks which is the correct interpretation, presumably based on the spirit of the rules. He is only being "programmatic" in arguing that this rule should be consistently applied.</p><p></p><p>2) Your own argument about dominate person and the polymorphed giant shows (at least to me) the failing of the common sense approach here. You are favoring the notion that type-changing effects should affect type-based spells, based on the spirit of the rules. I would argue that the spirit of the rules could just as easily support the opposite conclusion. Was the restriction of dominate person to affecting only humanoids meant to give shapeshifters the upper hand in this case, or was the change of type from polymorph type spells and powers meant as a way to terminate type-based spells? Is it really necessarily "common sense" that a dominated person can inadvertently break the domination by changing the form of his body (but not the nature of his mind)?</p><p></p><p>In this case, we have a specific situation that allows for multiple interpretations by RAW. The common sense approach could be applied, but, as you note, it's subjective, and in this case (as opposed to the case with Shillelagh, or with Ray of Enfeeblement preventing death by shadow attack) I think different people will cleave to different interpretations. You could base your choice on what you think is the spirit of the rules concerning these spells and powers, or you could look to comparable situations where the RAW are more clear.</p><p></p><p>--Axe</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pickaxe, post: 2153630, member: 10812"] How can someone be "out of touch" with something that's subjective? I agree that the spirit of the rules (which I believe is equivalent to what you are calling the common sense approach) is important, but I think you are missing two important points: 1) Hypersmurf is indeed taking an approach that considers the spirit of the rules, not just the "letter of the law." His iconic example is Shillelagh, where he identifies two possible interpretations of the RAW, and then essentially asks which is the correct interpretation, presumably based on the spirit of the rules. He is only being "programmatic" in arguing that this rule should be consistently applied. 2) Your own argument about dominate person and the polymorphed giant shows (at least to me) the failing of the common sense approach here. You are favoring the notion that type-changing effects should affect type-based spells, based on the spirit of the rules. I would argue that the spirit of the rules could just as easily support the opposite conclusion. Was the restriction of dominate person to affecting only humanoids meant to give shapeshifters the upper hand in this case, or was the change of type from polymorph type spells and powers meant as a way to terminate type-based spells? Is it really necessarily "common sense" that a dominated person can inadvertently break the domination by changing the form of his body (but not the nature of his mind)? In this case, we have a specific situation that allows for multiple interpretations by RAW. The common sense approach could be applied, but, as you note, it's subjective, and in this case (as opposed to the case with Shillelagh, or with Ray of Enfeeblement preventing death by shadow attack) I think different people will cleave to different interpretations. You could base your choice on what you think is the spirit of the rules concerning these spells and powers, or you could look to comparable situations where the RAW are more clear. --Axe [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
jgbrowning, Rystil Arden, and Hypersmurf talk amongst themselves
Top