Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 9261814" data-attributes="member: 6802378">But if you keep those limits in the creation of characters then it will be more difficult to sell new classes created later, for example the psionic manifesters, the incarnum soulmelders or the martial adepts (Tome of Battle: Book of the nine Swords). The creations by the first generation of players and game designers were very important, but years later the experience teachs us other ways. For example Curse of Strand in 5ed added a lot of new elements there weren't in the 2nd and the 3rd Ed. And why not?Athasian genasis were canon in 4th, they appeared in an article of Dragon Magazine (#396). They were Embersoul, Magmasoul, Sandsoul and Sunsoul.  <img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-FzBMjbgvGXI/TWukChT5mYI/AAAAAAAADW8/XQ377TnEAN8/s1600/genasi.bmp" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="width: 256px" />* Would you allow elements from 3.5 "Sandstorm" in your Dark Sun game?Other point is the controversies about canon is useless because after in your game you are totally free to change. Some times even the DMs change intentionally the metaplot to avoid players too warned because they read all in the fandom wiki.</blockquote>