Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
John Cooper reviews MMIII, and finds loads of mistakes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Non-human Resources" data-source="post: 1811492" data-attributes="member: 23409"><p>As I was reading this thread I was reminded of the saying “Fast, cheap, good quality: choose any two.”</p><p></p><p>Apparently, WotC thinks of their books as fast and cheap.</p><p></p><p>It’s true that a lot of these errors will never make a real difference in anyone’s game. If the difference in an attack bonus is only +1 then it will only make a difference 5% of the time.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, +2 damage can add up really quick, even in just a few rounds. It’s like giving an extra “Weapon Specilization: Claw” feat. Is that enough to justify increasing the CR of a critter? Probably not. Would you let your PCs get away with that? Definitely not.</p><p></p><p>I want to make two points here:</p><p></p><p>1) Playing with inaccurate stats is tantamount to cheating. Saying “It’s only a difference of 1” or “its WotC’s fault not mine” doesn’t make that better, nor does ignorance of the fact. (However, ignorance does make it forgivable for those who trust WotC to produce quality products.) I wouldn't let my players get away with that and I shouldn't let my game designers get away with it.</p><p></p><p>2) People who have decided not to buy this book (such as myself) on the basis that it is error ridden should email WotC and let them know of the fact. If enough people have said “I’m not buying Monster Manual III/Book of Exalted Deeds/Complete Divine for these reasons” Wizards will know what the problem is and how to fix it.</p><p></p><p>I’m not trying to take moral high ground here (but it seems I may have). I’m just tired of having to choose between good ideas+bad editing and bad ideas+good editing. Why should we have to choose?</p><p></p><p>For the record I think MMIII is a cool book. And I will borrow a friend’s copy if I need it. But I don’t think that this book is fast enough or cheap enough to justify the number of errors in it. I'm not buying it because I want WotC to fail, but instead because I want them to succeed. A better product will help that happen.</p><p></p><p>Edit: Some typos, because while not perfect I do try.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Non-human Resources, post: 1811492, member: 23409"] As I was reading this thread I was reminded of the saying “Fast, cheap, good quality: choose any two.” Apparently, WotC thinks of their books as fast and cheap. It’s true that a lot of these errors will never make a real difference in anyone’s game. If the difference in an attack bonus is only +1 then it will only make a difference 5% of the time. On the other hand, +2 damage can add up really quick, even in just a few rounds. It’s like giving an extra “Weapon Specilization: Claw” feat. Is that enough to justify increasing the CR of a critter? Probably not. Would you let your PCs get away with that? Definitely not. I want to make two points here: 1) Playing with inaccurate stats is tantamount to cheating. Saying “It’s only a difference of 1” or “its WotC’s fault not mine” doesn’t make that better, nor does ignorance of the fact. (However, ignorance does make it forgivable for those who trust WotC to produce quality products.) I wouldn't let my players get away with that and I shouldn't let my game designers get away with it. 2) People who have decided not to buy this book (such as myself) on the basis that it is error ridden should email WotC and let them know of the fact. If enough people have said “I’m not buying Monster Manual III/Book of Exalted Deeds/Complete Divine for these reasons” Wizards will know what the problem is and how to fix it. I’m not trying to take moral high ground here (but it seems I may have). I’m just tired of having to choose between good ideas+bad editing and bad ideas+good editing. Why should we have to choose? For the record I think MMIII is a cool book. And I will borrow a friend’s copy if I need it. But I don’t think that this book is fast enough or cheap enough to justify the number of errors in it. I'm not buying it because I want WotC to fail, but instead because I want them to succeed. A better product will help that happen. Edit: Some typos, because while not perfect I do try. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
John Cooper reviews MMIII, and finds loads of mistakes
Top