Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gfunk" data-source="post: 3312369" data-attributes="member: 1813">Well . . . ummmm . . . about that . . .You'll just have to wait until the next update! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Let me just say (and I agree w/ Schmoe), I believe that Anwar is irrevocably evil.&nbsp; Even worse than individuals like heads of demonic cults who believe in &quot;evil&quot; as a tangible concept, Anwar is totally apathetic.&nbsp; Sure he is greedy, but he is far worse than that.&nbsp; As Need_A_Life rightly pointed out, if Anwar was simply for profit above all else he would not kill/ruin people as indiscriminately as he does.&nbsp; Generally, he reserves his blackmail for people from whom he can truly gain something such as material wealth.However, as others have stated, Anwar is in a class of despicable all by himself.&nbsp; On the morality scale, I believe the Legion goes something like this (in decreasing magnitudes of Evil):Anwar &gt;&gt; Basil &gt; Thrisp &gt; Sepoto = Marius &gt;&gt; SamsonAnwar actively pursues evil agendas and is pure scum.Basil has just recently turned evil but I think this is largely due to apathy for the plights of others.Thrisp will cut moral corners on occasion but he has stood up to some of Anwar's more outrageous demands.Both Sepoto and Marius are honrable in their own way.&nbsp; Sepoto is a kind of a &quot;me, me, me!&quot; guy whereas Marius feels that the greater good sometimes outweighs people's personal rights.Samson is as close to good as the Legion will get.&nbsp; Though neutral he has washed his hands of many of the Legion's questionable activities.Therefore, I believe that readers should judge each character on his own moral judgements.&nbsp; Though Anwar often &quot;gets his way,&quot; due to inaction on the parts of others, I think this next update will show you that even Thrisp, Sepoto, Marius, Basil and Samson have their limits.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gfunk, post: 3312369, member: 1813"] Well . . . ummmm . . . about that . . . You'll just have to wait until the next update! ;) Let me just say (and I agree w/ Schmoe), I believe that Anwar is irrevocably evil. Even worse than individuals like heads of demonic cults who believe in "evil" as a tangible concept, Anwar is totally apathetic. Sure he is greedy, but he is far worse than that. As Need_A_Life rightly pointed out, if Anwar was simply for profit above all else he would not kill/ruin people as indiscriminately as he does. Generally, he reserves his blackmail for people from whom he can truly gain something such as material wealth. However, as others have stated, Anwar is in a class of despicable all by himself. On the morality scale, I believe the Legion goes something like this (in decreasing magnitudes of Evil): Anwar >> Basil > Thrisp > Sepoto = Marius >> Samson Anwar actively pursues evil agendas and is pure scum. Basil has just recently turned evil but I think this is largely due to apathy for the plights of others. Thrisp will cut moral corners on occasion but he has stood up to some of Anwar's more outrageous demands. Both Sepoto and Marius are honrable in their own way. Sepoto is a kind of a "me, me, me!" guy whereas Marius feels that the greater good sometimes outweighs people's personal rights. Samson is as close to good as the Legion will get. Though neutral he has washed his hands of many of the Legion's questionable activities. Therefore, I believe that readers should judge each character on his own moral judgements. Though Anwar often "gets his way," due to inaction on the parts of others, I think this next update will show you that even Thrisp, Sepoto, Marius, Basil and Samson have their limits. [/QUOTE]

Verification