Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 8200454" data-attributes="member: 87792">I see that you are missing a huge point. There is nothing wrong with wanting to do the preparation and planning in intense detail. But if you want to do the preparation and planning in intense detail you do not want to tell a heist style story like Leverage. I don't know whether you've ever seen an episode of Leverage but in Leverage they do not sit round and do all the preparation and planning in intense detail on screen. They show onscreen a basic outline of a plan then basically fast forward through it until it goes pear shaped. And Blades in the Dark is excellent at doing that.What you are saying is therefore that your group wants a Heist style story that is emphatically not like Leverage and that the reason Blades in the Dark does not work with your group is because it is like Leverage. There is nothing at all wrong with that - but saying "Blades does things like Leverage and my group doesn't want things to be done the way they are in Leverage" is not a rebuttal to "Blades is an excellent match for Leverage". Instead what you are doing is blaming a dog for not being a cat. And then saying that it's a "sweeping statement of opinion" that when your group wants a cat that a fully trained guide dog is a good dog.</blockquote>