Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 8200605" data-attributes="member: 6879661">Well as a lifelong holder of minority opinions I’m ok with that. I genuinely don’t think people make decisions based on three axis models. They like one element so nudge it one way at, then don’t like another so judge it another way. Multiple axis models still end up falling somewhere on a single axis when it comes to deciding appropriateness for a task.The reality is the multiple axis model you’re discussing could have dozen of axis. Does it do it well could itself be broken down into multiple different considerations. Character generation, action resolution, encounter building. These could all have very different view points.On the other hand, only really the second of those axis is relevent (with all its multiple permutations) for assessing the kind of question we’re asking. If you’re not interested in the aims you won’t even get into the question. Decision to use a system will be based predominantly on the second axis you describe unless circumstances change. Time isn’t really relevent to whether a system works for you or not.That said. It’s all a way to reach a value judgement and I’m sure on one way is as good as another. In either way a person still has to weigh up the value of different axis and reach an overall conclusion.</blockquote>