Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jonathan Tweet denounces Power Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tomBitonti" data-source="post: 3895493" data-attributes="member: 13107"><p>I've always thought that having a fixed bonus and a fixed reduction in attack bonus would make a lot more sense. Plus, that would unify power attack with other feats that have fixed benefits and penalties. As well, I think that cleave should *require* the use of power attack.</p><p></p><p>An "aggressive attack" feat would be nice, too, where you lose AC in return for increasing your attack bonus.</p><p></p><p>The options and feats, below, would make combat against multiple opponents *much* more deadly, and would make combat reflexes a lot more useful. Using these options, I would allow a combatant to make attacks-of-opportunity using the same progression as with normal attacks. (At +6 BAB allowing an attack-of-opportunity at +6 and at +1.)</p><p></p><p>And, of course, all of this jiggering turns into just the beginning of a whole suite of changes, as one works through the impacts and rebalances combat.</p><p></p><p>(Ooh ... allow power attack on attacks-of-opportunity, but only allow cleave attacks on other attacks-of-opportunity, and over and above the normal count of attacks-of-opportunity that you are normally allowed.)</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>So:</p><p></p><p>Power attack (Attack option): You may reduce your attack bonus by 4 in order to increase your damage by 2. You draw an attack-of-opportunity when you use this attack option. You may not use this option with a light weapon. With a two-handed weapon, your damage bonus is 4 instead of 2. You must use the power attack option to obtain the benefits of cleave.</p><p></p><p>Power attack (Feat): You may either reduce the penalty for using the power attack option to 2, or you may use the attack option without drawing an attack-of-opportunity.</p><p></p><p>Power specialization (Feat): You may obtain both benefits of the power attack feat. (Both the penalty reduction and the avoidance of an attack-of-opportunity).</p><p></p><p>Aggressive attack (Attack option): You may increase your attack bonus by 2 by reducing your armor class by 4. Using this attack option draws an attack-of-opportunity.</p><p></p><p>Aggressive attack (Feat): You may either reduce the penalty for using the aggressive attack option to 2, or you may use the attack option without drawing an attack-of-opportunity.</p><p></p><p>Aggression (Feat): You may obtain both benefits of the aggressive attack feat. (Both the penalty reduction and the avoidance of an attack-of-opportunity).</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>(You may notice that I'm not a big fan of the feats that provide two bonuses, such as improved overrun, which provides both a +4 bonus and eliminates the attack-of-opportunity.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tomBitonti, post: 3895493, member: 13107"] I've always thought that having a fixed bonus and a fixed reduction in attack bonus would make a lot more sense. Plus, that would unify power attack with other feats that have fixed benefits and penalties. As well, I think that cleave should *require* the use of power attack. An "aggressive attack" feat would be nice, too, where you lose AC in return for increasing your attack bonus. The options and feats, below, would make combat against multiple opponents *much* more deadly, and would make combat reflexes a lot more useful. Using these options, I would allow a combatant to make attacks-of-opportunity using the same progression as with normal attacks. (At +6 BAB allowing an attack-of-opportunity at +6 and at +1.) And, of course, all of this jiggering turns into just the beginning of a whole suite of changes, as one works through the impacts and rebalances combat. (Ooh ... allow power attack on attacks-of-opportunity, but only allow cleave attacks on other attacks-of-opportunity, and over and above the normal count of attacks-of-opportunity that you are normally allowed.) --- So: Power attack (Attack option): You may reduce your attack bonus by 4 in order to increase your damage by 2. You draw an attack-of-opportunity when you use this attack option. You may not use this option with a light weapon. With a two-handed weapon, your damage bonus is 4 instead of 2. You must use the power attack option to obtain the benefits of cleave. Power attack (Feat): You may either reduce the penalty for using the power attack option to 2, or you may use the attack option without drawing an attack-of-opportunity. Power specialization (Feat): You may obtain both benefits of the power attack feat. (Both the penalty reduction and the avoidance of an attack-of-opportunity). Aggressive attack (Attack option): You may increase your attack bonus by 2 by reducing your armor class by 4. Using this attack option draws an attack-of-opportunity. Aggressive attack (Feat): You may either reduce the penalty for using the aggressive attack option to 2, or you may use the attack option without drawing an attack-of-opportunity. Aggression (Feat): You may obtain both benefits of the aggressive attack feat. (Both the penalty reduction and the avoidance of an attack-of-opportunity). --- (You may notice that I'm not a big fan of the feats that provide two bonuses, such as improved overrun, which provides both a +4 bonus and eliminates the attack-of-opportunity.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jonathan Tweet denounces Power Attack
Top