Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jonathan Tweet denounces Power Attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 3905242" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>You know, I thought some more about the prior comment that my group doesn't increase their damage and I concluded that I 100% disagree with this claim. You can come far short of optimizing PA and still gain a solid advantage from it.</p><p></p><p>It is really easy to gauge what you need to roll to hit a particular target and adjust over the course of a few rounds. I am certain that they dish out substantially more damage than they would if they never used PA at all. And they don't spend any significant time dwelling on it. </p><p></p><p>For example, my wife tends to almost always start at 0 PA. If she hits with a 4 or something (or observes that other players are), she will start rolling in some PA. On really obvious easy hits she will do the opposite and start with a lot of PA and work back as needed. Either way the total damage output goes up and she ends up close to optimal just be natural tendency without the slightest need for dwelling on the math. And really, if a player is going to get themselves worked up over perfectly maximizing their damage output over being into the roll of a powerful warrior smashing his foes, then getting rid of the math isn't going to treat the core problem.</p><p></p><p>Because I will repeat that regardless of how much damage they do, the total amount of fun added by PA is very high in my group.</p><p></p><p>Be cool without any bogging at all is an awesome addition to the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 3905242, member: 957"] You know, I thought some more about the prior comment that my group doesn't increase their damage and I concluded that I 100% disagree with this claim. You can come far short of optimizing PA and still gain a solid advantage from it. It is really easy to gauge what you need to roll to hit a particular target and adjust over the course of a few rounds. I am certain that they dish out substantially more damage than they would if they never used PA at all. And they don't spend any significant time dwelling on it. For example, my wife tends to almost always start at 0 PA. If she hits with a 4 or something (or observes that other players are), she will start rolling in some PA. On really obvious easy hits she will do the opposite and start with a lot of PA and work back as needed. Either way the total damage output goes up and she ends up close to optimal just be natural tendency without the slightest need for dwelling on the math. And really, if a player is going to get themselves worked up over perfectly maximizing their damage output over being into the roll of a powerful warrior smashing his foes, then getting rid of the math isn't going to treat the core problem. Because I will repeat that regardless of how much damage they do, the total amount of fun added by PA is very high in my group. Be cool without any bogging at all is an awesome addition to the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Jonathan Tweet denounces Power Attack
Top