Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge backs Fox's rights to Watchmen
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 4435809" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>Quite. In what little I've read about the case it's been said nonetheless that this was rather expected, that Warner went ahead with production BECAUSE they knew it might come down to this and they wanted the movie in the can. It also said that just because a judge found legal standing to hold up their claims doesn't actually mean that they have any hope of the final rulings coming down on their side.</p><p> </p><p>In all I got the impression that this is just rote legal wrangling. Fox doesn't REALLY think they've been screwed over by Warner, it's just that they can CLAIM it. Fox and Warner, IIUC, are not the only studios to have worked on trying to get Watchmen produced - Warner just managed to actually do it where everyone else failed. When a project like this has been getting passed around since the last ice age this kind of obnoxiousness is expected and is probably little more than make-work for the studio lawyers. They might get money out of it, but I'm not sure they have any hope of actually delaying release. It's not like Warner STOLE the project from them in the dark of the night. Fox tried and <em>failed</em> to get it made - that's how it GOT to Warner.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 4435809, member: 32740"] Quite. In what little I've read about the case it's been said nonetheless that this was rather expected, that Warner went ahead with production BECAUSE they knew it might come down to this and they wanted the movie in the can. It also said that just because a judge found legal standing to hold up their claims doesn't actually mean that they have any hope of the final rulings coming down on their side. In all I got the impression that this is just rote legal wrangling. Fox doesn't REALLY think they've been screwed over by Warner, it's just that they can CLAIM it. Fox and Warner, IIUC, are not the only studios to have worked on trying to get Watchmen produced - Warner just managed to actually do it where everyone else failed. When a project like this has been getting passed around since the last ice age this kind of obnoxiousness is expected and is probably little more than make-work for the studio lawyers. They might get money out of it, but I'm not sure they have any hope of actually delaying release. It's not like Warner STOLE the project from them in the dark of the night. Fox tried and [I]failed[/I] to get it made - that's how it GOT to Warner. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge backs Fox's rights to Watchmen
Top