Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Firebird" data-source="post: 9698444" data-attributes="member: 7015803">It seems like most of the issues people are encountering with the technology are with misuse, not the technology as such. If you're the first lawyer to get a fake case from a LLM, not your fault. If you're the 50th, it's on your lack of due diligence. There's an <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1lrmom4/chatgpt_solved_a_10_year_problem_no_doctors_could/" target="_blank">interesting</a> case from a day ago where a patient claims a LLM diagnosed them successfully, confirming their results with a physician. I know some companies claim a higher success rate than physicians. It reminds me of the trajectory of Wikipedia. When I was in middle school, every teacher we had emphasized that it was untrustworthy and a bad source. By grad school, the faculty were recommending it as a source for various topics. I think that was possible in part because the attitude of skepticism towards it is now widespread.</blockquote>