Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9698746" data-attributes="member: 42856">Honestly? The job of the attorney is also to explain the ruling to his client. When Wife got the divorce filing, her attorney immediately checked the cases and found them bogus or irrelevant.For this to pass under the radar, you need:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a lying and careless attorney on the plaintiff's side (who may or may not have used AI to invent the bogus cases),</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a careless (or corrupt) judge who didn't check the cases and just signed a court order pre-written by Husband's attorney,</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">a careless attorney on the defendant's side.</li> </ul>That's a lot of grossly incompetent actors at the same time. It can happen, but I am not sure it happens more than an airplane mechanics being careless with maintaining a plane... And if you have this conjunction of inept people, they don't need AI at all to make a poor job. In the OP's article, there is no proof AI was involved, it's just a supposition because AI is prone to hallucinate, explaining the bogus case. But it's not the AI that made the lawyer draft the order for the judge, which may or may not be an acceptable practice in this case but from my legal background sounds extremely problematic (the job of the court is to draft the order and each word is carefully weighted, but maybe it's accepted in Georgia).</blockquote>