Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9699795" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>I guess it depends on where you live. I don't know of many places where printing, posting or telling false things is enough to be prosecuted, absent additional specific circumstances, even voluntarily. One might be found liable, but an outright ban is uncommon. I'd love to have examples of the contrary, but yes, generally just having a website that spews false things isn't punished. Or we could fine people for saying the Earth is flat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's what many countries do. Their view of free speech isn't defined by the first amendment of the US constitution, and they generally had a long debate on who can be prosecuted for press-related offenses on written media first, and then the Internet. Several countries hold the editor of the website responsible for what is written, irrespective of the author, because it's propagating the illegal message that is sanctionned, not creating it (so it's of little interest to determine if it can be attributed to the person using the service, or the company selling the service).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Same here, but on the basis that it doesn't enter one of the known categories of regulated speech, and long debates have been held to determine exactly what is tolerable speech (even if unethical or wrong or dangerous or simply because one doesn't like them) and what is banned, with no two countries having the exact same lines (blasphemy being protected speech in some countries and deemed too offensive in others, for example among many others), so the matter is considered settled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9699795, member: 42856"] I guess it depends on where you live. I don't know of many places where printing, posting or telling false things is enough to be prosecuted, absent additional specific circumstances, even voluntarily. One might be found liable, but an outright ban is uncommon. I'd love to have examples of the contrary, but yes, generally just having a website that spews false things isn't punished. Or we could fine people for saying the Earth is flat. That's what many countries do. Their view of free speech isn't defined by the first amendment of the US constitution, and they generally had a long debate on who can be prosecuted for press-related offenses on written media first, and then the Internet. Several countries hold the editor of the website responsible for what is written, irrespective of the author, because it's propagating the illegal message that is sanctionned, not creating it (so it's of little interest to determine if it can be attributed to the person using the service, or the company selling the service). Same here, but on the basis that it doesn't enter one of the known categories of regulated speech, and long debates have been held to determine exactly what is tolerable speech (even if unethical or wrong or dangerous or simply because one doesn't like them) and what is banned, with no two countries having the exact same lines (blasphemy being protected speech in some countries and deemed too offensive in others, for example among many others), so the matter is considered settled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
Top