Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Firebird" data-source="post: 9704949" data-attributes="member: 7015803"><p>I've been reflecting on this for a few days and want to add something.</p><p></p><p>My wife used to work with a patient population where diabetes was common. They'd get young kids with risk factors to develop it soon, and advise the parents how to help the kids avoid it. In many cases, the parents would get super prickly and defensive--"I'm diabetic, my friends are diabetic, are you saying there is something wrong with it? I don't think there is anything bad about my kid becoming diabetic".</p><p></p><p>Because it was so common, perhaps because they were insecure about it, it became a kind of identitarian marker for them. So, it took a lot of care to communicate solutions appropriately. Obviously the medical professionals trying to stop the kids from getting diabetes weren't saying they were better than people who had it. But it was perceived that way.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>The expertise angle works the same way. I know that you, Danny, are not saying that you (or medical professionals) are superior to other people in any way. But, there are a lot of people who aren't well educated, who didn't finish high school or attend college. And this can become an identitarian marker. And the same kind of defensiveness manifests. It can become kind of a game to look at highly educated people and make fun of the stupid things they do and their misconceptions (and <em>what they waste their money studying</em>, to connect to the science funding).</p><p></p><p>When you approach this kind of community and say "you don't have the training to evaluate medical claims with accuracy", it doesn't matter if you're right, and it doesn't matter that you have the best intentions and really want to help them. It is going to come across, to many people, as if you are saying "I think you're stupid because you didn't go to college". If you repeat this over and over while making decisions that affect their lives, it's going to breed distrust and resentment and conspiratorial thinking.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>If LLMs repeat this same kind of phrasing, I suspect you will see conspiracy theories regarding the creators, attempts to 'fix' the LLMs (we have seen some already) and 'alternative' LLMs (likewise).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Firebird, post: 9704949, member: 7015803"] I've been reflecting on this for a few days and want to add something. My wife used to work with a patient population where diabetes was common. They'd get young kids with risk factors to develop it soon, and advise the parents how to help the kids avoid it. In many cases, the parents would get super prickly and defensive--"I'm diabetic, my friends are diabetic, are you saying there is something wrong with it? I don't think there is anything bad about my kid becoming diabetic". Because it was so common, perhaps because they were insecure about it, it became a kind of identitarian marker for them. So, it took a lot of care to communicate solutions appropriately. Obviously the medical professionals trying to stop the kids from getting diabetes weren't saying they were better than people who had it. But it was perceived that way. --- The expertise angle works the same way. I know that you, Danny, are not saying that you (or medical professionals) are superior to other people in any way. But, there are a lot of people who aren't well educated, who didn't finish high school or attend college. And this can become an identitarian marker. And the same kind of defensiveness manifests. It can become kind of a game to look at highly educated people and make fun of the stupid things they do and their misconceptions (and [I]what they waste their money studying[/I], to connect to the science funding). When you approach this kind of community and say "you don't have the training to evaluate medical claims with accuracy", it doesn't matter if you're right, and it doesn't matter that you have the best intentions and really want to help them. It is going to come across, to many people, as if you are saying "I think you're stupid because you didn't go to college". If you repeat this over and over while making decisions that affect their lives, it's going to breed distrust and resentment and conspiratorial thinking. --- If LLMs repeat this same kind of phrasing, I suspect you will see conspiracy theories regarding the creators, attempts to 'fix' the LLMs (we have seen some already) and 'alternative' LLMs (likewise). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
Top