Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9705429" data-attributes="member: 42856">Sure. Nobody is proposing, as far as I know, to trust a general purpose LLM with a diagnosis. However, if I wanted to know about a few illness that cause flu-like symptoms, not because I want a diagnosis but because I want to read about some exotic diseases out of boredom or to create the outline of an adventure involving someone having a cough turning out to be deadly, I'd prefer the AI to give me the most accurate information it can instead of being told either hallucinations about flu-like symptom being an early warning of transforming to a Deep One, or being told to go see a doctor to chat.Dedicated diagnosis programs? Not so sure. There are independant studies that seem to show otherwise. I obviouslycan't assess the value of the journal it is published in, but it part of the series of reports showing, roughly, the same trend. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/article-851586[/URL]At some point, a relevant exam for being a doctor might be to beat a dedicated AI at its job. In the meantime, it should drive us to pour more effort into perfecting AI.</blockquote>