NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9705733" data-attributes="member: 42856">As long as enough don't, we're golden. The glue on pizza and taste-testing mushrooms are the exploding pressure-cookers of decade pasts, a risk that existed, but is no longer assessed again, in the future. They are all corrected and yet will be talked for years. Right now, LLMs are lacking training on enough legal datathat they can't provide specialized legal advice (only broad general description), and that's where they struggle -- for now.This is quite easy to test, given that there is ample computing power available to get the error rate if needed by submitting them synthetic questions. Not that anyone would be interested into running a trial test, unfortunately. There are correcting measures: simple ask an LLM to analyze and check what the first LLM outputs. It will catch most hallucinations (possibly providing other to be corrected by the first).With regard to non-specialized AI dispensing medical advice, do have a rate of accidents linked to improperly understanding medical advice on Google? Having accidents happening as a result of a misunderstanding of what an LLM dispenses is bad, but if it is identical or less than the alternative (people googling for health advice from a random board, which apparently two third of Internet users do), then maybe it's a public health improvement over the current situation.What is true of an LLM of 2023 isn't true about an LLM of end 2024 and what was true in late 2024 might not be true mid-2025. Forbidding LLMs to talk about a topic will disincentivize improvement in this field (a lawmaker will be loath to take the political risk to allow something that is previously disallowed...) so there will be less research to improve the products. Ackowledging that they are imperfect chatters and nothing more at the point until they can be proofed for more serious use is certainly the best way to go.</blockquote>

Verification