Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9705909" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>I am slightly more pessimistic. I think the population prioritize environmental concern that don't affect them. Say, with numbers used just to make a sentence: 2% of the population are commercial fisherman and 40% of the population don't care and have no political consciousness, and 60% of the population is rather OK with saying that environmental concerns are something they share. Even if the 2% of commercial fishermen are all concerned about environment, they'll complain about losing their industry, but you'll still get a majority to forbid commercial fishing.</p><p></p><p>Now, if you want to ban combustion-engine car, it's not 2% of commercial fisherman but 80% of car owner that will protest, and you'll be left with the support of the non-car owning 60%. That's 12% and you don't get your majority. I don't have high hopes for the goal of the EU to switch to electric car only in short time frame.</p><p></p><p>There are situations were representative can make better choices that their constituents based on elevated level of information (like the optimal tax rate), but I don't think environmental concerns are the best theme for that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9705909, member: 42856"] I am slightly more pessimistic. I think the population prioritize environmental concern that don't affect them. Say, with numbers used just to make a sentence: 2% of the population are commercial fisherman and 40% of the population don't care and have no political consciousness, and 60% of the population is rather OK with saying that environmental concerns are something they share. Even if the 2% of commercial fishermen are all concerned about environment, they'll complain about losing their industry, but you'll still get a majority to forbid commercial fishing. Now, if you want to ban combustion-engine car, it's not 2% of commercial fisherman but 80% of car owner that will protest, and you'll be left with the support of the non-car owning 60%. That's 12% and you don't get your majority. I don't have high hopes for the goal of the EU to switch to electric car only in short time frame. There are situations were representative can make better choices that their constituents based on elevated level of information (like the optimal tax rate), but I don't think environmental concerns are the best theme for that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Judge decides case based on AI-hallucinated case law
Top